Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / IESC VS PWR

IESC vs PWR

IES Holdings, Inc. and Quanta Services, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

IESC vs PWR, at a glance
Metric IESC PWR
Revenue$3.4B$28.5B
Net income$306.0M$1.0B
Gross margin25.5%15.0%
Net margin9.2%3.7%
Return on equity40.9%12.7%
Diluted EPS$15.02$6.80
Dividend / share·$0.41
Payout ratio·5.9%
Free cash flow$218.8M$1.6B
Equity$884.0M$8.9B
Net debt / equity−0.14×0.62×
Current ratio1.71×1.14×
Revenue CAGR 5y23.1%20.5%
Profit CAGR 5y49.0%18.2%

PWR bills 8.4× the revenue of IESC, and IESC keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (9.2% against 3.7%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

IESC vs PWR, revenue by year
Fiscal year IESC PWR
FY2025$3.4B$28.5B
FY2024$2.9B$23.7B
FY2023$2.4B$20.9B
FY2022$2.2B$17.1B
FY2021$1.5B$13.0B
FY2020$1.2B$11.2B
FY2019$1.1B$12.1B
FY2018$876.8M$11.2B
FY2017$810.7M$9.5B
FY2016$696.0M$7.7B
Net income by year

Bottom line

IESC vs PWR, net income by year
Fiscal year IESC PWR
FY2025$306.0M$1.0B
FY2024$219.1M$904.8M
FY2023$108.3M$744.7M
FY2022$34.8M$491.2M
FY2021$66.7M$486.0M
FY2020$41.6M$445.6M
FY2019$33.2M$402.0M
FY2018$-14.2M$293.3M
FY2017$13.4M$315.0M
FY2016$120.8M$200.1M
Revenue gap over time

17 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$25,108,229,000PWR
FY2024−$20,788,437,000PWR
FY2023−$18,504,979,000PWR
FY2022−$14,907,095,000PWR
FY2021−$11,443,720,000PWR
FY2020−$10,011,816,000PWR
FY2019−$11,035,157,000PWR
FY2018−$10,294,595,000PWR
FY2017−$8,655,734,000PWR
FY2016−$6,955,326,000PWR
FY2015−$6,998,579,000PWR
FY2014−$7,234,834,000PWR
FY2013−$5,916,984,000PWR
FY2012−$5,464,154,000PWR
FY2011−$3,787,623,000PWR
FY2010−$3,247,002,000PWR
FY2009−$2,651,089,000PWR

PWR has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 17 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

17 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+5.6 ppIESC
FY2024+4.1 ppIESC
FY2023+1.4 ppIESC
FY2022−1.1 ppPWR
FY2021+0.7 ppIESC
FY2020−0.6 ppPWR
FY2019−0.3 ppPWR
FY2018−4.2 ppPWR
FY2017−1.7 ppPWR
FY2016+14.8 ppIESC
FY2015−1.4 ppPWR
FY2014−3.0 ppPWR
FY2013−7.3 ppPWR
FY2012−8.0 ppPWR
FY2011−12.8 ppPWR
FY2010−12.4 ppPWR
FY2009−6.7 ppPWR

The higher net margin has changed hands between IESC and PWR over this period.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

IESC's net margin has been more volatile than PWR's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 6.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.0.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between IESC and PWR over these 17 fiscal years — IESC led in 5 and PWR in 12.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

IESC's return on equity has been more volatile than PWR's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 27.5 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.6.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between IESC and PWR over these 17 fiscal years — IESC led in 9 and PWR in 8.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages