Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / IMO VS SU

IMO vs SU

Imperial OIL Ltd. and Suncor Energy Inc., side by side — 6 fiscal years reported in CAD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

IMO vs SU, at a glance
Metric IMO SU
RevenueCAD 47.1BCAD 52.4B
Net incomeCAD 3.3BCAD 5.9B
Gross margin··
Net margin6.9%11.3%
Return on equity14.3%13.2%
Diluted EPSCAD 6.48CAD 4.85
Dividend / shareCAD 2.88CAD 2.31
Payout ratio42.9%47.5%
Free cash flowCAD 4.7B·
EquityCAD 22.3B·
Net debt / equity0.10×0.14×
Current ratio1.27×1.39×
Revenue CAGR 5y16.0%15.9%
Profit CAGR 5y··

IMO and SU book revenue within 15% of each other, and SU keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (11.3% against 6.9%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

6 years side by side

IMO vs SU, revenue by year
Fiscal year IMO SU
FY2025CAD 47.1BCAD 52.4B
FY2024CAD 51.5BCAD 54.9B
FY2023CAD 51.0BCAD 52.2B
FY2022CAD 59.7BCAD 62.9B
FY2021CAD 37.6BCAD 39.1B
FY2020CAD 22.4BCAD 25.1B
Net income by year

Bottom line

IMO vs SU, net income by year
Fiscal year IMO SU
FY2025CAD 3.3BCAD 5.9B
FY2024CAD 4.8BCAD 6.0B
FY2023CAD 4.9BCAD 8.3B
FY2022CAD 7.3BCAD 9.1B
FY2021CAD 2.5BCAD 4.1B
FY2020CAD -1.9BCAD -4.3B
Revenue gap over time

6 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−CAD 5,299,000,000SU
FY2024−CAD 3,349,000,000SU
FY2023−CAD 1,237,000,000SU
FY2022−CAD 3,237,000,000SU
FY2021−CAD 1,511,000,000SU
FY2020−CAD 2,664,000,000SU

SU has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 6 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

6 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

6 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−4.4 ppSU
FY2024−1.7 ppSU
FY2023−6.3 ppSU
FY2022−2.1 ppSU
FY2021−3.9 ppSU
FY2020+8.9 ppIMO

The higher net margin has changed hands between IMO and SU over this period.

6 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

SU's net margin has been more volatile than IMO's over the 6 comparable fiscal years — 11.3 percentage points of standard deviation against 6.7.

6 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between IMO and SU over these 6 fiscal years — IMO led in 1 and SU in 5.

6 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

IMO's return on equity has been more volatile than SU's over the 10 comparable fiscal years — 10.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 9.3.

10 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between IMO and SU over these 10 fiscal years — IMO led in 9 and SU in 1.

10 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages