JKS vs VIOT
JinkoSolar Holding Co. Ltd. and Viomi Technology Co. Ltd., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in CNY, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | JKS | VIOT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | CNY 65.5B | CNY 2.4B |
| Net income | CNY -4.4B | CNY 141.9M |
| Gross margin | 2.2% | 25.3% |
| Net margin | −10.9% | 5.8% |
| Return on equity | −25.0% | 9.6% |
| Diluted EPS | −CNY 21.33 | CNY 0.67 |
| Dividend / share | · | · |
| Payout ratio | · | · |
| Free cash flow | CNY -2.1B | CNY 113.5M |
| Equity | CNY 15.7B | CNY 1.5B |
| Net debt / equity | −0.59× | −0.48× |
| Current ratio | 1.25× | 2.60× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 13.3% | −16.1% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | · |
JKS bills 27.0× the revenue of VIOT, and JKS closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | JKS | VIOT |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | CNY 65.5B | CNY 2.4B |
| FY2024 | CNY 92.3B | CNY 2.1B |
| FY2023 | CNY 118.7B | CNY 1.6B |
| FY2022 | CNY 83.1B | CNY 1.8B |
| FY2021 | CNY 40.8B | CNY 5.3B |
| FY2020 | CNY 35.1B | CNY 5.8B |
| FY2019 | CNY 29.7B | CNY 4.6B |
| FY2018 | CNY 25.0B | CNY 2.6B |
| FY2017 | CNY 26.5B | CNY 873.2M |
| FY2016 | CNY 21.4B | CNY 312.6M |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | JKS | VIOT |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | CNY -4.4B | CNY 141.9M |
| FY2024 | CNY 54.5M | CNY 62.3M |
| FY2023 | CNY 3.4B | CNY -89.3M |
| FY2022 | CNY 620.5M | CNY -282.6M |
| FY2021 | CNY 721.0M | CNY 88.6M |
| FY2020 | CNY 230.4M | CNY 173.3M |
| FY2019 | CNY 898.7M | CNY 292.2M |
| FY2018 | CNY 406.5M | CNY 65.4M |
| FY2017 | CNY 141.7M | CNY 93.2M |
| FY2016 | CNY 1.8B | CNY 16.3M |
10 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +CNY 63,069,420,000 | JKS |
| FY2024 | +CNY 90,137,320,000 | JKS |
| FY2023 | +CNY 117,039,855,000 | JKS |
| FY2022 | +CNY 81,337,051,000 | JKS |
| FY2021 | +CNY 35,522,686,000 | JKS |
| FY2020 | +CNY 29,303,835,000 | JKS |
| FY2019 | +CNY 25,098,774,759 | JKS |
| FY2018 | +CNY 22,481,384,341 | JKS |
| FY2017 | +CNY 25,599,724,454 | JKS |
| FY2016 | +CNY 21,088,064,092 | JKS |
JKS has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 10 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
10 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
10 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −16.7 pp | VIOT |
| FY2024 | −2.9 pp | VIOT |
| FY2023 | +10.9 pp | JKS |
| FY2022 | +17.7 pp | JKS |
| FY2021 | +0.7 pp | JKS |
| FY2020 | −2.0 pp | VIOT |
| FY2019 | −3.2 pp | VIOT |
| FY2018 | −0.9 pp | VIOT |
| FY2017 | −10.1 pp | VIOT |
| FY2016 | +4.1 pp | JKS |
The higher net margin has changed hands between JKS and VIOT over this period.
10 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
VIOT's net margin has been more volatile than JKS's over the 10 comparable fiscal years — 7.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 4.9.
10 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between JKS and VIOT over these 10 fiscal years — JKS led in 4 and VIOT in 6.
10 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
JKS's return on equity has been more volatile than VIOT's over the 7 comparable fiscal years — 12.6 percentage points of standard deviation against 12.4.
7 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between JKS and VIOT over these 7 fiscal years — JKS led in 3 and VIOT in 4.
7 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.