LOVE vs TTSH
Lovesac Co. and Tile Shop Holdings, Inc., side by side — 9 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | LOVE | TTSH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $697.1M | $336.8M |
| Net income | $4.1M | $-4.5M |
| Gross margin | 56.4% | 63.8% |
| Net margin | 0.6% | −1.3% |
| Return on equity | 1.9% | −4.3% |
| Diluted EPS | $0.28 | −$0.10 |
| Dividend / share | · | · |
| Payout ratio | · | · |
| Free cash flow | $26.2M | $-3.8M |
| Equity | $218.7M | · |
| Net debt / equity | · | 0.17× |
| Current ratio | 1.61× | 1.43× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 16.8% | 0.7% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | −22.7% | · |
LOVE bills 2.1× the revenue of TTSH, and TTSH closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
9 years side by side
| Fiscal year | LOVE | TTSH |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $697.1M | $336.8M |
| FY2024 | $680.6M | $347.1M |
| FY2023 | $700.3M | $377.1M |
| FY2022 | $651.2M | $394.7M |
| FY2021 | $498.2M | $370.7M |
| FY2020 | $320.7M | $325.1M |
| FY2019 | $233.4M | $340.4M |
| FY2018 | $165.9M | $357.3M |
| FY2017 | $101.8M | $344.6M |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | LOVE | TTSH |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $4.1M | $-4.5M |
| FY2024 | $11.6M | $2.3M |
| FY2023 | $23.9M | $10.1M |
| FY2022 | $26.5M | $15.7M |
| FY2021 | $47.5M | $14.8M |
| FY2020 | $14.7M | $6.0M |
| FY2019 | $-15.2M | $-4.5M |
| FY2018 | $-6.7M | $10.4M |
| FY2017 | $-5.5M | $10.8M |
9 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +$360,295,000 | LOVE |
| FY2024 | +$333,557,000 | LOVE |
| FY2023 | +$323,119,000 | LOVE |
| FY2022 | +$256,477,000 | LOVE |
| FY2021 | +$127,539,000 | LOVE |
| FY2020 | −$4,319,000 | TTSH |
| FY2019 | −$106,974,000 | TTSH |
| FY2018 | −$191,372,703 | TTSH |
| FY2017 | −$242,789,587 | TTSH |
The higher-revenue side has changed between LOVE and TTSH over this period. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
9 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
9 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +1.9 pp | LOVE |
| FY2024 | +1.0 pp | LOVE |
| FY2023 | +0.7 pp | LOVE |
| FY2022 | +0.1 pp | LOVE |
| FY2021 | +5.5 pp | LOVE |
| FY2020 | +2.7 pp | LOVE |
| FY2019 | −5.2 pp | TTSH |
| FY2018 | −7.0 pp | TTSH |
| FY2017 | −8.5 pp | TTSH |
The higher net margin has changed hands between LOVE and TTSH over this period.
9 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
LOVE's net margin has been more volatile than TTSH's over the 9 comparable fiscal years — 5.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.9.
9 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between LOVE and TTSH over these 9 fiscal years — LOVE led in 6 and TTSH in 3.
9 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
LOVE's return on equity has been more volatile than TTSH's over the 9 comparable fiscal years — 17.7 percentage points of standard deviation against 5.8.
9 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between LOVE and TTSH over these 9 fiscal years — LOVE led in 6 and TTSH in 3.
9 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.