Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / PETS VS RDGT

PETS vs RDGT

Petmed Express Inc. and Ridgetech Inc., side by side — 7 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

PETS vs RDGT, at a glance
Metric PETS RDGT
Revenue$179.0M$132.2M
Net income$-57.3M$-1.3M
Gross margin28.1%3.6%
Net margin−32.0%−0.9%
Return on equity−100.4%−3.6%
Diluted EPS−$2.74−$17.21
Dividend / share$0.00·
Payout ratio−0.0%·
Free cash flow$-33.0M$-1.4M
Equity$28.9M·
Net debt / equity··
Current ratio0.84×2.31×
Revenue CAGR 5y−10.0%−0.1%
Profit CAGR 5y··

PETS bills 1.4× the revenue of RDGT, and both closed the last reported year at a loss.

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

7 years side by side

PETS vs RDGT, revenue by year
Fiscal year PETS RDGT
FY2025$179.0M$132.2M
FY2024$227.0M$120.0M
FY2023$274.1M$124.0M
FY2022$247.6M$120.2M
FY2021$272.3M$164.4M
FY2020$303.6M$133.1M
FY2019$284.1M$117.3M
Net income by year

Bottom line

PETS vs RDGT, net income by year
Fiscal year PETS RDGT
FY2025$-57.3M$-1.3M
FY2024$-6.3M$10.2M
FY2023$-7.5M$-4.2M
FY2022$5.1M$-21.1M
FY2021$18.7M$-3.2M
FY2020$23.9M$-8.1M
FY2019$25.9M$-5.8M
Revenue gap over time

7 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$46,857,266PETS
FY2024+$107,000,362PETS
FY2023+$150,100,947PETS
FY2022+$127,369,807PETS
FY2021+$107,889,445PETS
FY2020+$170,448,367PETS
FY2019+$166,797,311PETS

PETS has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 7 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.

7 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

7 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−31.1 ppRDGT
FY2024−11.3 ppRDGT
FY2023+0.7 ppPETS
FY2022+19.7 ppPETS
FY2021+8.8 ppPETS
FY2020+14.2 ppPETS
FY2019+14.6 ppPETS

The higher net margin has changed hands between PETS and RDGT over this period.

7 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

PETS's net margin has been more volatile than RDGT's over the 7 comparable fiscal years — 13.2 percentage points of standard deviation against 7.2.

7 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between PETS and RDGT over these 7 fiscal years — PETS led in 5 and RDGT in 2.

7 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

RDGT's return on equity has been more volatile than PETS's over the 7 comparable fiscal years — 40.3 percentage points of standard deviation against 39.3.

7 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between PETS and RDGT over these 7 fiscal years — PETS led in 5 and RDGT in 2.

7 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages