ROMA vs TDIC
Roma Green Finance Ltd. and Dreamland Ltd., side by side — 3 fiscal years reported in HKD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | ROMA | TDIC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | HKD 9.5M | HKD 45.8M |
| Net income | HKD -27.3M | HKD 6.4M |
| Gross margin | 17.1% | · |
| Net margin | −287.8% | 14.0% |
| Return on equity | −44.2% | 112.5% |
| Diluted EPS | −HKD 0.53 | · |
| Dividend / share | · | · |
| Payout ratio | · | · |
| Free cash flow | HKD -19.8M | · |
| Equity | HKD 75.0M | · |
| Net debt / equity | · | · |
| Current ratio | 22.34× | 1.33× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | · | · |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | · |
TDIC bills 4.8× the revenue of ROMA, and ROMA closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
3 years side by side
| Fiscal year | ROMA | TDIC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | HKD 12.2M | HKD 45.8M |
| FY2023 | HKD 9.9M | HKD 20.4M |
| FY2022 | HKD 13.6M | HKD 3.6M |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | ROMA | TDIC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | HKD -27.8M | HKD 6.4M |
| FY2023 | HKD -5.8M | HKD 7.1M |
| FY2022 | HKD -1.0M | HKD -482,783 |
Standard deviation, each side
ROMA's net margin has been more volatile than TDIC's over the 3 comparable fiscal years — 94.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 19.7.
3 of 5 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between ROMA and TDIC over these 3 fiscal years — ROMA led in 1 and TDIC in 2.
3 of 5 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.