Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / SHOO VS VRA

SHOO vs VRA

Steven Madden, Ltd. and Vera Bradley, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

SHOO vs VRA, at a glance
Metric SHOO VRA
Revenue$2.5B$269.7M
Net income$49.0M$-47.8M
Gross margin41.4%46.4%
Net margin1.9%−12.1%
Return on equity5.7%−30.8%
Diluted EPS$0.63−$1.71
Dividend / share$0.84·
Payout ratio124.4%·
Free cash flow$119.5M$-13.3M
Equity$866.4M$131.6M
Net debt / equity0.14×·
Current ratio1.90×2.37×
Revenue CAGR 5y16.1%−10.5%
Profit CAGR 5y··

SHOO bills 9.4× the revenue of VRA, and VRA closed the last reported year at a loss.

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

SHOO vs VRA, revenue by year
Fiscal year SHOO VRA
FY2025$2.5B$269.7M
FY2024$2.3B$318.8M
FY2023$2.0B$383.7M
FY2022$2.1B$500.0M
FY2021$1.9B$540.5M
FY2020$1.2B$468.3M
FY2019$1.8B$495.2M
FY2018$1.7B$416.1M
FY2017$1.6B$454.6M
FY2016$1.4B$485.9M
Net income by year

Bottom line

SHOO vs VRA, net income by year
Fiscal year SHOO VRA
FY2025$49.0M$-47.8M
FY2024$175.9M$-62.2M
FY2023$174.0M$7.8M
FY2022$217.2M$-59.7M
FY2021$192.5M$17.8M
FY2020$-18.3M$8.7M
FY2019$141.7M$16.0M
FY2018$129.1M$20.8M
FY2017$117.9M$7.0M
FY2016$121.3M$19.8M
Revenue gap over time

17 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$2,264,458,000SHOO
FY2024+$1,964,132,000SHOO
FY2023+$1,597,869,000SHOO
FY2022+$1,622,048,000SHOO
FY2021+$1,325,689,000SHOO
FY2020+$733,542,000SHOO
FY2019+$1,291,945,000SHOO
FY2018+$1,261,637,000SHOO
FY2017+$1,112,435,000SHOO
FY2016+$913,614,000SHOO
FY2015+$902,641,000SHOO
FY2014+$825,961,000SHOO
FY2013+$783,327,000SHOO
FY2012+$691,405,000SHOO
FY2011+$507,706,000SHOO
FY2010+$269,361,000SHOO
FY2009+$214,610,000SHOO

SHOO has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 17 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

17 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+14.1 ppSHOO
FY2024+18.2 ppSHOO
FY2023+6.5 ppSHOO
FY2022+26.1 ppSHOO
FY2021+6.6 ppSHOO
FY2020−3.8 ppVRA
FY2019+4.9 ppSHOO
FY2018+2.8 ppSHOO
FY2017+6.1 ppSHOO
FY2016+4.6 ppSHOO
FY2015+2.6 ppSHOO
FY2014+0.9 ppSHOO
FY2013−0.9 ppVRA
FY2012−3.1 ppVRA
FY2011−2.5 ppVRA
FY2010−0.7 ppVRA
FY2009−5.0 ppVRA

The higher net margin has changed hands between SHOO and VRA over this period.

17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

VRA's net margin has been more volatile than SHOO's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 8.7 percentage points of standard deviation against 3.2.

17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between SHOO and VRA over these 17 fiscal years — SHOO led in 11 and VRA in 6.

17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

VRA's return on equity has been more volatile than SHOO's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 27.9 percentage points of standard deviation against 6.8.

17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between SHOO and VRA over these 17 fiscal years — SHOO led in 11 and VRA in 6.

17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages