SHOO vs VRA
Steven Madden, Ltd. and Vera Bradley, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
At a glance
Most recent reported year
| Metric | SHOO | VRA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.5B | $269.7M |
| Net income | $49.0M | $-47.8M |
| Gross margin | 41.4% | 46.4% |
| Net margin | 1.9% | −17.7% |
| Return on equity | 5.7% | −30.8% |
| Diluted EPS | $0.63 | −$1.71 |
| Dividend / share | $0.84 | — |
| Payout ratio | 124.4% | — |
| Free cash flow | $119.5M | $-13.3M |
| Equity | $866.4M | $131.6M |
| Net debt / equity | 0.14× | −0.23× |
| Current ratio | 1.90× | 2.37× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 16.1% | −10.5% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | — | — |
SHOO bills 9.4× the revenue of VRA, and VRA closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner.
Advertisement
AdSense · Leaderboard 728×90 · responsive
Revenue by year
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | SHOO | VRA |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $2.5B | $269.7M |
| FY2024 | $2.3B | $318.8M |
| FY2023 | $2.0B | $383.7M |
| FY2022 | $2.1B | $500.0M |
| FY2021 | $1.9B | $540.5M |
| FY2020 | $1.2B | $468.3M |
| FY2019 | $1.8B | $495.2M |
| FY2018 | $1.7B | $416.1M |
| FY2017 | $1.6B | $454.6M |
| FY2016 | $1.4B | $485.9M |
Net income by year
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | SHOO | VRA |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $49.0M | $-47.8M |
| FY2024 | $175.9M | $-62.2M |
| FY2023 | $174.0M | $7.8M |
| FY2022 | $217.2M | $-59.7M |
| FY2021 | $192.5M | $17.8M |
| FY2020 | $-18.3M | $8.7M |
| FY2019 | $141.7M | $16.0M |
| FY2018 | $129.1M | $20.8M |
| FY2017 | $117.9M | $7.0M |
| FY2016 | $121.3M | $19.8M |
Advertisement
AdSense · Rectangle 336×280