ACB vs IMCC
Aurora Cannabis Inc. and IM Cannabis Corp., side by side — 5 fiscal years reported in CAD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | ACB | IMCC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | CAD 343.3M | CAD 54.7M |
| Net income | CAD 1.6M | CAD -11.3M |
| Gross margin | 54.6% | 17.7% |
| Net margin | 0.5% | −21.5% |
| Return on equity | 0.3% | · |
| Diluted EPS | CAD 0.04 | −CAD 2.67 |
| Dividend / share | · | · |
| Payout ratio | · | · |
| Free cash flow | · | CAD 4.7M |
| Equity | CAD 567.2M | CAD -3.7M |
| Net debt / equity | −0.17× | · |
| Current ratio | 4.31× | 0.67× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | · | 28.1% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | · |
ACB bills 6.3× the revenue of IMCC, and IMCC closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
5 years side by side
| Fiscal year | ACB | IMCC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | CAD 343.3M | CAD 54.0M |
| FY2023 | CAD 269.6M | CAD 48.8M |
| FY2021 | CAD 221.3M | CAD 34.1M |
| FY2020 | CAD 245.3M | CAD 15.9M |
| FY2019 | CAD 268.7M | CAD 9.1M |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | ACB | IMCC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | CAD 1.6M | CAD -10.6M |
| FY2023 | CAD -69.3M | CAD -9.5M |
| FY2021 | CAD -1.7B | CAD -17.8M |
| FY2020 | CAD -692.0M | CAD -28.7M |
| FY2019 | CAD -3.3B | CAD -7.3M |
5 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | +CAD 289,262,000 | ACB |
| FY2023 | +CAD 220,833,000 | ACB |
| FY2021 | +CAD 187,286,000 | ACB |
| FY2020 | +CAD 229,362,000 | ACB |
| FY2019 | +CAD 259,629,000 | ACB |
ACB has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 5 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
5 of 9 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
5 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | +22.2 pp | ACB |
| FY2023 | −4.8 pp | IMCC |
| FY2021 | −721.8 pp | IMCC |
| FY2020 | −102.6 pp | IMCC |
| FY2019 | −1149.8 pp | IMCC |
The higher net margin has changed hands between ACB and IMCC over this period.
5 of 9 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
ACB's net margin has been more volatile than IMCC's over the 5 comparable fiscal years — 474.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 59.0.
5 of 9 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between ACB and IMCC over these 5 fiscal years — ACB led in 1 and IMCC in 4.
5 of 9 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
IMCC's return on equity has been more volatile than ACB's over the 5 comparable fiscal years — 53.6 percentage points of standard deviation against 50.3.
5 of 8 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between ACB and IMCC over these 5 fiscal years — ACB led in 3 and IMCC in 2.
5 of 8 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.