BTMD vs CURLF
biote Corp. and Curaleaf Holdings, Inc., side by side — 5 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | BTMD | CURLF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $192.2M | $1.3B |
| Net income | $27.0M | $-231.1M |
| Gross margin | 71.5% | 49.8% |
| Net margin | 16.4% | −18.0% |
| Return on equity | · | −28.6% |
| Diluted EPS | $0.74 | −$0.35 |
| Dividend / share | · | · |
| Payout ratio | 6.4% | · |
| Free cash flow | $30.2M | $74.3M |
| Equity | $-58.5M | $756.4M |
| Net debt / equity | · | 0.59× |
| Current ratio | 1.22× | 1.52× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | · | · |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | · |
CURLF bills 6.6× the revenue of BTMD, and CURLF closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
5 years side by side
| Fiscal year | BTMD | CURLF |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $192.2M | $1.3B |
| FY2024 | $197.2M | $1.3B |
| FY2023 | $185.4M | $1.3B |
| FY2022 | $165.0M | $1.3B |
| FY2021 | $139.4M | $1.2B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | BTMD | CURLF |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $27.0M | $-231.1M |
| FY2024 | $3.2M | $-215.4M |
| FY2023 | $3.3M | $-281.2M |
| FY2022 | $-969,000 | $-370.1M |
| FY2021 | $32.6M | $-205.9M |
5 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −$1,075,916,000 | CURLF |
| FY2024 | −$1,137,108,000 | CURLF |
| FY2023 | −$1,161,272,000 | CURLF |
| FY2022 | −$1,110,463,000 | CURLF |
| FY2021 | −$1,056,591,000 | CURLF |
CURLF has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 5 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
5 of 5 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
5 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +34.4 pp | BTMD |
| FY2024 | +16.7 pp | BTMD |
| FY2023 | +20.0 pp | BTMD |
| FY2022 | +30.4 pp | BTMD |
| FY2021 | +41.3 pp | BTMD |
BTMD has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 5 fiscal years.
5 of 5 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
BTMD's net margin has been more volatile than CURLF's over the 5 comparable fiscal years — 10.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 4.7.
5 of 5 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
BTMD led in net margin in every one of the 5 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.
5 of 5 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.