CURLF vs TLRY
Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. and Tilray Brands, Inc., side by side — 5 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | CURLF | TLRY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $915.5M |
| Net income | $-231.1M | $-121.4M |
| Gross margin | 49.8% | 28.4% |
| Net margin | −18.0% | −11.5% |
| Return on equity | −28.6% | −7.8% |
| Diluted EPS | −$0.35 | −$1.09 |
| Dividend / share | · | · |
| Payout ratio | · | · |
| Free cash flow | $74.3M | · |
| Equity | $756.4M | $1.6B |
| Net debt / equity | 0.59× | −0.13× |
| Current ratio | 1.52× | 2.21× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | · | 12.3% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | · |
CURLF bills 1.4× the revenue of TLRY, and both closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
5 years side by side
| Fiscal year | CURLF | TLRY |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $1.3B | $915.5M |
| FY2024 | $1.3B | $821.3M |
| FY2023 | $1.3B | $788.9M |
| FY2022 | $1.3B | $627.1M |
| FY2021 | $1.2B | $628.4M |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | CURLF | TLRY |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $-231.1M | $-121.4M |
| FY2024 | $-215.4M | $-2.2B |
| FY2023 | $-281.2M | $-245.0M |
| FY2022 | $-370.1M | $-1.5B |
| FY2021 | $-205.9M | $-476.8M |
5 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +$352,681,000 | CURLF |
| FY2024 | +$512,990,000 | CURLF |
| FY2023 | +$557,690,000 | CURLF |
| FY2022 | +$648,296,000 | CURLF |
| FY2021 | +$567,615,000 | CURLF |
CURLF has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 5 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.
5 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
5 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −6.5 pp | TLRY |
| FY2024 | +249.0 pp | CURLF |
| FY2023 | +6.6 pp | CURLF |
| FY2022 | +200.5 pp | CURLF |
| FY2021 | +51.1 pp | CURLF |
The higher net margin has changed hands between CURLF and TLRY over this period.
5 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
TLRY's net margin has been more volatile than CURLF's over the 5 comparable fiscal years — 105.9 percentage points of standard deviation against 4.7.
5 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between CURLF and TLRY over these 5 fiscal years — CURLF led in 4 and TLRY in 1.
5 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
TLRY's return on equity has been more volatile than CURLF's over the 5 comparable fiscal years — 31.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 5.2.
5 of 8 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between CURLF and TLRY over these 5 fiscal years — CURLF led in 2 and TLRY in 3.
5 of 8 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.