Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / ADM VS MDLZ

ADM vs MDLZ

Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. and Mondelez International, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

ADM vs MDLZ, at a glance
Metric ADM MDLZ
Revenue$80.3B$38.5B
Net income$1.1B$2.5B
Gross margin6.3%28.4%
Net margin1.3%6.4%
Return on equity4.8%9.3%
Diluted EPS$2.23$1.89
Dividend / share$2.04$1.94
Payout ratio91.6%101.5%
Free cash flow$4.2B$3.2B
Equity·$25.8B
Net debt / equity0.29×0.69×
Current ratio1.37×0.59×
Revenue CAGR 5y4.5%7.7%
Profit CAGR 5y−9.5%−7.2%

ADM bills 2.1× the revenue of MDLZ, and MDLZ keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (6.4% against 1.3%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

ADM vs MDLZ, revenue by year
Fiscal year ADM MDLZ
FY2025$80.3B$38.5B
FY2024$85.5B$36.4B
FY2023$93.9B$36.0B
FY2022$101.6B$31.5B
FY2021$85.2B$28.7B
FY2020$64.4B$26.6B
FY2019$64.7B$25.9B
FY2018$64.3B$25.9B
FY2017$60.8B$25.9B
FY2016$62.3B$25.9B
Net income by year

Bottom line

ADM vs MDLZ, net income by year
Fiscal year ADM MDLZ
FY2025$1.1B$2.5B
FY2024$1.8B$4.6B
FY2023$3.5B$5.0B
FY2022$4.3B$2.7B
FY2021$2.7B$4.3B
FY2020$1.8B$3.6B
FY2019$1.4B$3.9B
FY2018$1.8B$3.3B
FY2017$1.6B$2.8B
FY2016$1.3B$1.6B
Revenue gap over time

19 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$41,732,000,000ADM
FY2024+$49,089,000,000ADM
FY2023+$57,919,000,000ADM
FY2022+$70,060,000,000ADM
FY2021+$56,529,000,000ADM
FY2020+$37,774,000,000ADM
FY2019+$38,788,000,000ADM
FY2018+$38,403,000,000ADM
FY2017+$34,932,000,000ADM
FY2016+$36,423,000,000ADM
FY2015+$38,066,000,000ADM
FY2014+$46,957,000,000ADM
FY2013+$54,505,000,000ADM
FY2012+$55,544,000,000ADM
FY2011+$53,228,000,000ADM
FY2010+$49,187,000,000ADM
FY2009+$22,928,000,000ADM
FY2008+$28,715,000,000ADM
FY2007+$33,958,000,000ADM

ADM has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 19 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

19 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−5.1 ppMDLZ
FY2024−10.6 ppMDLZ
FY2023−10.1 ppMDLZ
FY2022−4.4 ppMDLZ
FY2021−11.8 ppMDLZ
FY2020−10.7 ppMDLZ
FY2019−13.1 ppMDLZ
FY2018−10.0 ppMDLZ
FY2017−8.3 ppMDLZ
FY2016−4.3 ppMDLZ
FY2015−21.9 ppMDLZ
FY2014−3.7 ppMDLZ
FY2013−9.6 ppMDLZ
FY2012−7.3 ppMDLZ
FY2011−8.6 ppMDLZ
FY2010−10.6 ppMDLZ
FY2009−4.7 ppMDLZ
FY2008−4.7 ppMDLZ
FY2007−5.0 ppMDLZ

MDLZ has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 19 fiscal years.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

MDLZ's net margin has been more volatile than ADM's over the 19 comparable fiscal years — 4.3 percentage points of standard deviation against 0.8.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

MDLZ led in net margin in every one of the 19 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

MDLZ's return on equity has been more volatile than ADM's over the 19 comparable fiscal years — 4.3 percentage points of standard deviation against 3.3.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between ADM and MDLZ over these 19 fiscal years — ADM led in 6 and MDLZ in 13.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages