Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / ADM VS PEP

ADM vs PEP

Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. and PepsiCo Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

ADM vs PEP, at a glance
Metric ADM PEP
Revenue$80.3B$93.9B
Net income$1.1B$8.2B
Gross margin6.3%54.1%
Net margin1.3%8.8%
Return on equity4.8%42.9%
Diluted EPS$2.23$6.00
Dividend / share$2.04$5.62
Payout ratio91.6%92.7%
Free cash flow$4.2B$7.7B
Equity·$20.4B
Net debt / equity0.29×1.96×
Current ratio1.37×0.85×
Revenue CAGR 5y4.5%5.9%
Profit CAGR 5y−9.5%3.0%

PEP bills 1.2× the revenue of ADM, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (8.8% against 1.3%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

ADM vs PEP, revenue by year
Fiscal year ADM PEP
FY2025$80.3B$93.9B
FY2024$85.5B$91.9B
FY2023$93.9B$91.5B
FY2022$101.6B$86.4B
FY2021$85.2B$79.5B
FY2020$64.4B$70.4B
FY2019$64.7B$67.2B
FY2018$64.3B$64.7B
FY2017$60.8B$63.5B
FY2016$62.3B$62.8B
Net income by year

Bottom line

ADM vs PEP, net income by year
Fiscal year ADM PEP
FY2025$1.1B$8.2B
FY2024$1.8B$9.6B
FY2023$3.5B$9.1B
FY2022$4.3B$8.9B
FY2021$2.7B$7.6B
FY2020$1.8B$7.1B
FY2019$1.4B$7.3B
FY2018$1.8B$12.5B
FY2017$1.6B$4.9B
FY2016$1.3B$6.3B
Revenue gap over time

19 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$13,656,000,000PEP
FY2024−$6,324,000,000PEP
FY2023+$2,464,000,000ADM
FY2022+$15,164,000,000ADM
FY2021+$5,775,000,000ADM
FY2020−$6,017,000,000PEP
FY2019−$2,505,000,000PEP
FY2018−$320,000,000PEP
FY2017−$2,697,000,000PEP
FY2016−$453,000,000PEP
FY2015+$4,646,000,000ADM
FY2014+$14,518,000,000ADM
FY2013+$23,389,000,000ADM
FY2012+$25,067,000,000ADM
FY2011+$22,534,000,000ADM
FY2010+$22,838,000,000ADM
FY2009+$18,450,000,000ADM
FY2008+$25,956,000,000ADM
FY2007+$30,342,000,000ADM

The higher-revenue side has changed between ADM and PEP over this period. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

19 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−7.5 ppPEP
FY2024−8.4 ppPEP
FY2023−6.3 ppPEP
FY2022−6.1 ppPEP
FY2021−6.5 ppPEP
FY2020−7.4 ppPEP
FY2019−8.8 ppPEP
FY2018−16.6 ppPEP
FY2017−5.1 ppPEP
FY2016−8.1 ppPEP
FY2015−6.0 ppPEP
FY2014−7.1 ppPEP
FY2013−8.7 ppPEP
FY2012−8.0 ppPEP
FY2011−8.3 ppPEP
FY2010−8.5 ppPEP
FY2009−10.7 ppPEP
FY2008−9.5 ppPEP
FY2007−11.8 ppPEP

PEP has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 19 fiscal years.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

PEP's net margin has been more volatile than ADM's over the 19 comparable fiscal years — 2.5 percentage points of standard deviation against 0.8.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

PEP led in net margin in every one of the 19 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

PEP's return on equity has been more volatile than ADM's over the 19 comparable fiscal years — 15.5 percentage points of standard deviation against 3.3.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

PEP led in return on equity in every one of the 19 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages