ADM vs PEP
Archer-daniels-midland Co. and PepsiCo, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
At a glance
Most recent reported year
| Metric | ADM | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $80.3B | $93.9B |
| Net income | $1.1B | $8.2B |
| Gross margin | 6.3% | 54.1% |
| Net margin | 1.3% | 8.8% |
| Return on equity | — | 42.9% |
| Diluted EPS | $2.23 | $6.00 |
| Dividend / share | $2.04 | $5.62 |
| Payout ratio | 91.6% | 92.7% |
| Free cash flow | $4.2B | $7.7B |
| Equity | — | $20.4B |
| Net debt / equity | — | 1.96× |
| Current ratio | 1.37× | 0.85× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 4.5% | 5.9% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | −9.5% | 3.0% |
PEP bills 1.2× the revenue of ADM, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (8.8% against 1.3%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner.
Advertisement
AdSense · Leaderboard 728×90 · responsive
Revenue by year
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | ADM | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $80.3B | $93.9B |
| FY2024 | $85.5B | $91.9B |
| FY2023 | $93.9B | $91.5B |
| FY2022 | $101.6B | $86.4B |
| FY2021 | $85.2B | $79.5B |
| FY2020 | $64.4B | $70.4B |
| FY2019 | $64.7B | $67.2B |
| FY2018 | $64.3B | $64.7B |
| FY2017 | $60.8B | $63.5B |
| FY2016 | $62.3B | $62.8B |
Net income by year
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | ADM | PEP |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $1.1B | $8.2B |
| FY2024 | $1.8B | $9.6B |
| FY2023 | $3.5B | $9.1B |
| FY2022 | $4.3B | $8.9B |
| FY2021 | $2.7B | $7.6B |
| FY2020 | $1.8B | $7.1B |
| FY2019 | $1.4B | $7.3B |
| FY2018 | $1.8B | $12.5B |
| FY2017 | $1.6B | $4.9B |
| FY2016 | $1.3B | $6.3B |
Advertisement
AdSense · Rectangle 336×280