Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / MDLZ VS PEP

MDLZ vs PEP

Mondelez International, Inc. and PepsiCo Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

MDLZ vs PEP, at a glance
Metric MDLZ PEP
Revenue$38.5B$93.9B
Net income$2.5B$8.2B
Gross margin28.4%54.1%
Net margin6.4%8.8%
Return on equity9.3%42.9%
Diluted EPS$1.89$6.00
Dividend / share$1.94$5.62
Payout ratio101.5%92.7%
Free cash flow$3.2B$7.7B
Equity$25.8B$20.4B
Net debt / equity0.69×1.96×
Current ratio0.59×0.85×
Revenue CAGR 5y7.7%5.9%
Profit CAGR 5y−7.2%3.0%

PEP bills 2.4× the revenue of MDLZ, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (8.8% against 6.4%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

MDLZ vs PEP, revenue by year
Fiscal year MDLZ PEP
FY2025$38.5B$93.9B
FY2024$36.4B$91.9B
FY2023$36.0B$91.5B
FY2022$31.5B$86.4B
FY2021$28.7B$79.5B
FY2020$26.6B$70.4B
FY2019$25.9B$67.2B
FY2018$25.9B$64.7B
FY2017$25.9B$63.5B
FY2016$25.9B$62.8B
Net income by year

Bottom line

MDLZ vs PEP, net income by year
Fiscal year MDLZ PEP
FY2025$2.5B$8.2B
FY2024$4.6B$9.6B
FY2023$5.0B$9.1B
FY2022$2.7B$8.9B
FY2021$4.3B$7.6B
FY2020$3.6B$7.1B
FY2019$3.9B$7.3B
FY2018$3.3B$12.5B
FY2017$2.8B$4.9B
FY2016$1.6B$6.3B
Revenue gap over time

19 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$55,388,000,000PEP
FY2024−$55,413,000,000PEP
FY2023−$55,455,000,000PEP
FY2022−$54,896,000,000PEP
FY2021−$50,754,000,000PEP
FY2020−$43,791,000,000PEP
FY2019−$41,293,000,000PEP
FY2018−$38,723,000,000PEP
FY2017−$37,629,000,000PEP
FY2016−$36,876,000,000PEP
FY2015−$33,420,000,000PEP
FY2014−$32,439,000,000PEP
FY2013−$31,116,000,000PEP
FY2012−$30,477,000,000PEP
FY2011−$30,694,000,000PEP
FY2010−$26,349,000,000PEP
FY2009−$4,478,000,000PEP
FY2008−$2,759,000,000PEP
FY2007−$3,616,000,000PEP

PEP has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 19 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

19 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−2.4 ppPEP
FY2024+2.2 ppMDLZ
FY2023+3.8 ppMDLZ
FY2022−1.7 ppPEP
FY2021+5.4 ppMDLZ
FY2020+3.2 ppMDLZ
FY2019+4.3 ppMDLZ
FY2018−6.6 ppPEP
FY2017+3.2 ppMDLZ
FY2016−3.8 ppPEP
FY2015+15.9 ppMDLZ
FY2014−3.4 ppPEP
FY2013+0.9 ppMDLZ
FY2012−0.7 ppPEP
FY2011+0.3 ppMDLZ
FY2010+2.2 ppMDLZ
FY2009−6.0 ppPEP
FY2008−4.8 ppPEP
FY2007−6.8 ppPEP

The higher net margin has changed hands between MDLZ and PEP over this period.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

MDLZ's net margin has been more volatile than PEP's over the 19 comparable fiscal years — 4.3 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.5.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between MDLZ and PEP over these 19 fiscal years — MDLZ led in 10 and PEP in 9.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

PEP's return on equity has been more volatile than MDLZ's over the 19 comparable fiscal years — 15.5 percentage points of standard deviation against 4.3.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

PEP led in return on equity in every one of the 19 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages