AES vs CDTG
AES Corp. and CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Ltd., side by side — 5 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | AES | CDTG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.2B | $18.2M |
| Net income | $910.0M | $-10.2M |
| Gross margin | 18.1% | 41.5% |
| Net margin | 1.3% | −56.9% |
| Return on equity | 23.6% | −30.0% |
| Diluted EPS | $1.26 | −$0.84 |
| Dividend / share | $0.70 | · |
| Payout ratio | 55.1% | · |
| Free cash flow | $-1.6B | $-1.5M |
| Equity | $4.1B | $30.6M |
| Net debt / equity | · | · |
| Current ratio | 0.77× | 1.46× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 4.8% | · |
| Profit CAGR 5y | 81.7% | · |
AES bills 671.2× the revenue of CDTG, and CDTG closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
5 years side by side
| Fiscal year | AES | CDTG |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $12.2B | $18.2M |
| FY2024 | $12.3B | $29.8M |
| FY2023 | $12.7B | $34.2M |
| FY2022 | $12.6B | $28.8M |
| FY2021 | $11.1B | $23.6M |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | AES | CDTG |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $910.0M | $-10.2M |
| FY2024 | $1.7B | $1.5M |
| FY2023 | $249.0M | $7.4M |
| FY2022 | $-546.0M | $5.8M |
| FY2021 | $-409.0M | $6.8M |
5 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +$12,214,774,181 | AES |
| FY2024 | +$12,248,234,795 | AES |
| FY2023 | +$12,633,790,081 | AES |
| FY2022 | +$12,588,150,638 | AES |
| FY2021 | +$11,117,443,180 | AES |
AES has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 5 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
5 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
5 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +58.2 pp | AES |
| FY2024 | +1.8 pp | AES |
| FY2023 | −22.0 pp | CDTG |
| FY2022 | −22.2 pp | CDTG |
| FY2021 | −36.5 pp | CDTG |
The higher net margin has changed hands between AES and CDTG over this period.
5 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
CDTG's net margin has been more volatile than AES's over the 5 comparable fiscal years — 30.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 5.1.
5 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between AES and CDTG over these 5 fiscal years — AES led in 2 and CDTG in 3.
5 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
AES's return on equity has been more volatile than CDTG's over the 5 comparable fiscal years — 27.5 percentage points of standard deviation against 22.4.
5 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between AES and CDTG over these 5 fiscal years — AES led in 2 and CDTG in 3.
5 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.