AGRO vs GTBIF
Adecoagro S.a. and Green Thumb Industries Inc., side by side — 7 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | AGRO | GTBIF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $1.2B |
| Net income | $92.3M | $114.2M |
| Gross margin | 28.6% | 48.9% |
| Net margin | 6.1% | 9.7% |
| Return on equity | 7.1% | 6.2% |
| Diluted EPS | $0.90 | $0.48 |
| Dividend / share | · | · |
| Payout ratio | · | · |
| Free cash flow | $68.1M | $213.9M |
| Equity | $1.4B | $1.9B |
| Net debt / equity | 0.42× | −0.01× |
| Current ratio | 2.54× | 3.26× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 11.4% | 16.1% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | 50.1% |
AGRO bills 1.3× the revenue of GTBIF, and GTBIF keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (9.7% against 6.1%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
7 years side by side
| Fiscal year | AGRO | GTBIF |
|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | $1.5B | $1.1B |
| FY2023 | $1.3B | $1.1B |
| FY2022 | $1.3B | $1.0B |
| FY2021 | $1.1B | $893.6M |
| FY2020 | $817.8M | $556.6M |
| FY2019 | $887.1M | $216.4M |
| FY2018 | $793.2M | $62.5M |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | AGRO | GTBIF |
|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | $92.3M | $73.1M |
| FY2023 | $226.3M | $36.3M |
| FY2022 | $108.1M | $12.0M |
| FY2021 | $130.7M | $75.4M |
| FY2020 | $412,000 | $15.0M |
| FY2019 | $-772,000 | $-59.1M |
| FY2018 | $-24.6M | $-5.2M |
7 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | +$381,766,000 | AGRO |
| FY2023 | +$244,318,000 | AGRO |
| FY2022 | +$330,349,000 | AGRO |
| FY2021 | +$230,792,000 | AGRO |
| FY2020 | +$261,191,000 | AGRO |
| FY2019 | +$670,705,000 | AGRO |
| FY2018 | +$730,745,320 | AGRO |
AGRO has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 7 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.
7 of 11 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
7 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2024 | −0.4 pp | GTBIF |
| FY2023 | +14.0 pp | AGRO |
| FY2022 | +6.9 pp | AGRO |
| FY2021 | +3.2 pp | AGRO |
| FY2020 | −2.6 pp | GTBIF |
| FY2019 | +27.4 pp | AGRO |
| FY2018 | +5.5 pp | AGRO |
The higher net margin has changed hands between AGRO and GTBIF over this period.
7 of 11 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
GTBIF's net margin has been more volatile than AGRO's over the 7 comparable fiscal years — 11.5 percentage points of standard deviation against 6.7.
7 of 11 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between AGRO and GTBIF over these 7 fiscal years — AGRO led in 5 and GTBIF in 2.
7 of 11 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
AGRO's return on equity has been more volatile than GTBIF's over the 7 comparable fiscal years — 7.5 percentage points of standard deviation against 4.8.
7 of 11 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between AGRO and GTBIF over these 7 fiscal years — AGRO led in 5 and GTBIF in 2.
7 of 11 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.