CTVA vs GTBIF
Corteva, Inc. and Green Thumb Industries Inc., side by side — 8 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | CTVA | GTBIF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $17.4B | $1.2B |
| Net income | $1.1B | $114.2M |
| Gross margin | 47.3% | 48.9% |
| Net margin | 6.4% | 9.7% |
| Return on equity | 4.6% | 6.2% |
| Diluted EPS | $1.60 | $0.48 |
| Dividend / share | $0.70 | · |
| Payout ratio | 43.4% | · |
| Free cash flow | $2.8B | $213.9M |
| Equity | $24.1B | $1.9B |
| Net debt / equity | −0.09× | −0.01× |
| Current ratio | 1.43× | 3.26× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 4.1% | 16.1% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | 9.9% | 50.1% |
CTVA bills 14.8× the revenue of GTBIF, and GTBIF keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (9.7% against 6.4%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
8 years side by side
| Fiscal year | CTVA | GTBIF |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $17.4B | $1.2B |
| FY2024 | $16.9B | $1.1B |
| FY2023 | $17.2B | $1.1B |
| FY2022 | $17.5B | $1.0B |
| FY2021 | $15.7B | $893.6M |
| FY2020 | $14.2B | $556.6M |
| FY2019 | $13.8B | $216.4M |
| FY2018 | $14.3B | $62.5M |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | CTVA | GTBIF |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $1.1B | $114.2M |
| FY2024 | $907.0M | $73.1M |
| FY2023 | $735.0M | $36.3M |
| FY2022 | $1.1B | $12.0M |
| FY2021 | $1.8B | $75.4M |
| FY2020 | $681.0M | $15.0M |
| FY2019 | $-959.0M | $-59.1M |
| FY2018 | $-5.1B | $-5.2M |
8 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +$16,225,705,000 | CTVA |
| FY2024 | +$15,770,859,000 | CTVA |
| FY2023 | +$16,171,447,000 | CTVA |
| FY2022 | +$16,437,625,000 | CTVA |
| FY2021 | +$14,761,440,000 | CTVA |
| FY2020 | +$13,660,427,000 | CTVA |
| FY2019 | +$13,629,567,000 | CTVA |
| FY2018 | +$14,224,506,320 | CTVA |
CTVA has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 8 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
8 of 8 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
8 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −3.4 pp | GTBIF |
| FY2024 | −1.0 pp | GTBIF |
| FY2023 | +0.9 pp | CTVA |
| FY2022 | +5.5 pp | CTVA |
| FY2021 | +2.9 pp | CTVA |
| FY2020 | +2.2 pp | CTVA |
| FY2019 | +20.5 pp | CTVA |
| FY2018 | −26.8 pp | GTBIF |
The higher net margin has changed hands between CTVA and GTBIF over this period.
8 of 8 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
CTVA's net margin has been more volatile than GTBIF's over the 8 comparable fiscal years — 14.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 11.4.
8 of 8 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between CTVA and GTBIF over these 8 fiscal years — CTVA led in 5 and GTBIF in 3.
8 of 8 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
GTBIF's return on equity has been more volatile than CTVA's over the 8 comparable fiscal years — 4.9 percentage points of standard deviation against 4.1.
8 of 8 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between CTVA and GTBIF over these 8 fiscal years — CTVA led in 5 and GTBIF in 3.
8 of 8 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.