AMR vs METC
Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. and Ramaco Resources, Inc., side by side — 9 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | AMR | METC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1B | $536.6M |
| Net income | $-61.7M | $-51.4M |
| Gross margin | 9.6% | 15.5% |
| Net margin | −2.9% | −9.6% |
| Return on equity | −3.9% | −12.2% |
| Diluted EPS | −$4.75 | −$0.99 |
| Dividend / share | · | · |
| Payout ratio | −0.7% | −8.4% |
| Free cash flow | $17.8M | · |
| Equity | $1.5B | $483.6M |
| Net debt / equity | −0.23× | 0.06× |
| Current ratio | 4.47× | 5.46× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 8.5% | 26.0% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | · |
AMR bills 4.0× the revenue of METC, and both closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
9 years side by side
| Fiscal year | AMR | METC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $2.1B | $536.6M |
| FY2024 | $3.0B | $666.3M |
| FY2023 | $3.5B | $693.5M |
| FY2022 | $4.1B | $565.7M |
| FY2021 | $2.3B | $283.4M |
| FY2020 | $1.4B | $168.9M |
| FY2019 | $2.0B | $168.9M |
| FY2018 | $2.0B | $227.6M |
| FY2017 | $1.6B | $61.0M |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | AMR | METC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $-61.7M | $-51.4M |
| FY2024 | $187.6M | $11.2M |
| FY2023 | $722.0M | $82.3M |
| FY2022 | $1.4B | $116.0M |
| FY2021 | $288.8M | $39.8M |
| FY2020 | $-446.9M | $-4.9M |
| FY2019 | $-316.3M | $24.9M |
| FY2018 | $299.2M | $25.1M |
| FY2017 | $154.5M | $-15.4M |
9 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +$1,592,863,000 | AMR |
| FY2024 | +$2,290,990,000 | AMR |
| FY2023 | +$2,777,893,000 | AMR |
| FY2022 | +$3,535,904,000 | AMR |
| FY2021 | +$1,975,292,000 | AMR |
| FY2020 | +$1,247,272,000 | AMR |
| FY2019 | +$1,832,365,000 | AMR |
| FY2018 | +$1,803,631,000 | AMR |
| FY2017 | +$1,588,933,000 | AMR |
AMR has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 9 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
9 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
9 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +6.7 pp | AMR |
| FY2024 | +4.7 pp | AMR |
| FY2023 | +8.9 pp | AMR |
| FY2022 | +14.8 pp | AMR |
| FY2021 | −1.2 pp | METC |
| FY2020 | −28.7 pp | METC |
| FY2019 | −30.6 pp | METC |
| FY2018 | +3.7 pp | AMR |
| FY2017 | +34.6 pp | AMR |
The higher net margin has changed hands between AMR and METC over this period.
9 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
AMR's net margin has been more volatile than METC's over the 9 comparable fiscal years — 18.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 13.7.
9 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between AMR and METC over these 9 fiscal years — AMR led in 6 and METC in 3.
9 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
AMR's return on equity has been more volatile than METC's over the 8 comparable fiscal years — 69.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 16.6.
8 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between AMR and METC over these 8 fiscal years — AMR led in 6 and METC in 2.
8 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.