Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / ARHS VS WSM

ARHS vs WSM

Arhaus, Inc. and Williams Sonoma Inc., side by side — 7 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

ARHS vs WSM, at a glance
Metric ARHS WSM
Revenue$1.4B$7.8B
Net income$67.3M$1.1B
Gross margin38.9%46.2%
Net margin4.9%13.9%
Return on equity17.7%51.5%
Diluted EPS$0.48$8.84
Dividend / share·$2.64
Payout ratio0.5%29.1%
Free cash flow$59.0M$1.1B
Equity$418.2M$2.1B
Net debt / equity··
Current ratio1.37×1.39×
Revenue CAGR 5y22.1%2.9%
Profit CAGR 5y61.7%9.8%

WSM bills 5.7× the revenue of ARHS, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (13.9% against 4.9%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

7 years side by side

ARHS vs WSM, revenue by year
Fiscal year ARHS WSM
FY2025$1.4B$7.8B
FY2024$1.3B$7.7B
FY2023$1.3B$7.8B
FY2022$1.2B$8.7B
FY2021$796.9M$8.2B
FY2020$507.4M$6.8B
FY2019$494.5M$5.9B
Net income by year

Bottom line

ARHS vs WSM, net income by year
Fiscal year ARHS WSM
FY2025$67.3M$1.1B
FY2024$68.5M$1.1B
FY2023$125.2M$949.8M
FY2022$136.6M$1.1B
FY2021$36.9M$1.1B
FY2020$6.1M$680.7M
FY2019$7.5M$356.1M
Revenue gap over time

7 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$6,427,594,000WSM
FY2024−$6,440,434,000WSM
FY2023−$6,462,948,000WSM
FY2022−$7,445,489,000WSM
FY2021−$7,449,014,000WSM
FY2020−$6,275,760,000WSM
FY2019−$5,403,470,000WSM

WSM has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 7 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

7 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

7 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−9.1 ppWSM
FY2024−9.2 ppWSM
FY2023−2.5 ppWSM
FY2022−1.9 ppWSM
FY2021−9.0 ppWSM
FY2020−6.7 ppWSM
FY2019−2.8 ppWSM

WSM has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 7 fiscal years.

7 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

ARHS's net margin has been more volatile than WSM's over the 7 comparable fiscal years — 2.9 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.8.

7 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

WSM led in net margin in every one of the 7 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

7 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

ARHS's return on equity has been more volatile than WSM's over the 4 comparable fiscal years — 32.2 percentage points of standard deviation against 6.9.

4 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between ARHS and WSM over these 4 fiscal years — ARHS led in 1 and WSM in 3.

4 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages