Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / ARL VS GOOD

ARL vs GOOD

American Realty Investors Inc. and Gladstone Commercial Corp., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

ARL vs GOOD, at a glance
Metric ARL GOOD
Revenue$50.0M$161.3M
Net income$15.7M$19.3M
Gross margin59.9%92.8%
Net margin37.1%12.0%
Return on equity2.6%11.2%
Diluted EPS$0.97$0.14
Dividend / share$0.00$1.20
Payout ratio·353.5%
Free cash flow$-85.0M·
Equity$617.4M$171.8M
Net debt / equity0.32×4.85×
Current ratio··
Revenue CAGR 5y−3.3%3.9%
Profit CAGR 5y·5.2%

GOOD bills 3.2× the revenue of ARL, and ARL keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (37.1% against 12.0%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

ARL vs GOOD, revenue by year
Fiscal year ARL GOOD
FY2025$50.0M$161.3M
FY2024$47.3M$149.4M
FY2023$50.5M$147.6M
FY2022$37.5M$149.0M
FY2021$42.0M$137.7M
FY2020$59.0M$133.2M
FY2019$59.0M$114.4M
FY2018$149.9M$106.8M
FY2017$126.2M$94.8M
FY2016$119.7M$86.4M
Net income by year

Bottom line

ARL vs GOOD, net income by year
Fiscal year ARL GOOD
FY2025$15.7M$19.3M
FY2024$-14.7M$24.0M
FY2023$4.0M$5.0M
FY2022$373.3M$10.8M
FY2021$3.3M$10.9M
FY2020$11.3M$14.9M
FY2019$-16.0M$9.6M
FY2018$173.7M$12.3M
FY2017$-8.4M$5.9M
FY2016$-2.7M$4.0M
Revenue gap over time

17 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$111,322,000GOOD
FY2024−$102,070,000GOOD
FY2023−$97,084,000GOOD
FY2022−$111,437,000GOOD
FY2021−$95,649,000GOOD
FY2020−$74,126,000GOOD
FY2019−$55,399,000GOOD
FY2018+$43,151,000ARL
FY2017+$31,422,000ARL
FY2016+$33,291,000ARL
FY2015+$20,422,000ARL
FY2014+$5,656,000ARL
FY2013+$19,407,000ARL
FY2012+$30,579,000ARL
FY2011−$43,895,925GOOD
FY2010−$41,821,495GOOD
FY2009+$70,709,000ARL

The higher-revenue side has changed between ARL and GOOD over this period. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

15 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+25.1 ppARL
FY2024−44.5 ppGOOD
FY2023+7.1 ppARL
FY2022+1258.8 ppARL
FY2021+7.4 ppARL
FY2020+7.8 ppARL
FY2019−45.2 ppGOOD
FY2018+110.3 ppARL
FY2017−13.3 ppGOOD
FY2016−6.6 ppGOOD
FY2015−7.4 ppGOOD
FY2014+58.6 ppARL
FY2013+61.6 ppARL
FY2011−21.4 ppGOOD
FY2009−83.7 ppGOOD

The higher net margin has changed hands between ARL and GOOD over this period.

15 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

ARL's net margin has been more volatile than GOOD's over the 15 comparable fiscal years — 316.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 5.6.

15 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between ARL and GOOD over these 15 fiscal years — ARL led in 8 and GOOD in 7.

15 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

ARL's return on equity has been more volatile than GOOD's over the 16 comparable fiscal years — 1803.7 percentage points of standard deviation against 4.0.

16 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between ARL and GOOD over these 16 fiscal years — ARL led in 4 and GOOD in 12.

16 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages