GOOD vs INVH
Gladstone Commercial Corp. and Invitation Homes Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | GOOD | INVH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $161.3M | $2.7B |
| Net income | $19.3M | $587.9M |
| Gross margin | 92.8% | 86.5% |
| Net margin | 12.0% | 21.6% |
| Return on equity | 11.2% | 6.1% |
| Diluted EPS | $0.14 | $0.96 |
| Dividend / share | $1.20 | $1.17 |
| Payout ratio | 353.5% | 121.2% |
| Free cash flow | · | · |
| Equity | $171.8M | $9.5B |
| Net debt / equity | 4.85× | 0.87× |
| Current ratio | · | · |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 3.9% | 8.4% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | 5.2% | 24.5% |
INVH bills 16.9× the revenue of GOOD, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (21.6% against 12.0%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | GOOD | INVH |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $161.3M | $2.7B |
| FY2024 | $149.4M | $2.6B |
| FY2023 | $147.6M | $2.4B |
| FY2022 | $149.0M | $2.2B |
| FY2021 | $137.7M | $2.0B |
| FY2020 | $133.2M | $1.8B |
| FY2019 | $114.4M | $1.8B |
| FY2017 | $94.8M | $1.1B |
| FY2016 | $86.4M | $922.6M |
| FY2015 | $83.8M | $836.0M |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | GOOD | INVH |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $19.3M | $587.9M |
| FY2024 | $24.0M | $453.9M |
| FY2023 | $5.0M | $519.5M |
| FY2022 | $10.8M | $383.3M |
| FY2021 | $10.9M | $261.4M |
| FY2020 | $14.9M | $196.2M |
| FY2019 | $9.6M | $145.5M |
| FY2017 | $5.9M | $-105.3M |
| FY2016 | $4.0M | $-78.2M |
| FY2015 | $3.6M | $-160.2M |
10 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −$2,567,960,000 | INVH |
| FY2024 | −$2,469,554,000 | INVH |
| FY2023 | −$2,284,694,000 | INVH |
| FY2022 | −$2,089,140,000 | INVH |
| FY2021 | −$1,858,927,000 | INVH |
| FY2020 | −$1,689,676,000 | INVH |
| FY2019 | −$1,650,298,000 | INVH |
| FY2017 | −$959,657,000 | INVH |
| FY2016 | −$836,215,000 | INVH |
| FY2015 | −$752,283,000 | INVH |
INVH has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 10 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
10 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
10 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −9.7 pp | INVH |
| FY2024 | −1.3 pp | INVH |
| FY2023 | −18.1 pp | INVH |
| FY2022 | −10.0 pp | INVH |
| FY2021 | −5.2 pp | INVH |
| FY2020 | +0.4 pp | GOOD |
| FY2019 | +0.0 pp | GOOD |
| FY2017 | +16.3 pp | GOOD |
| FY2016 | +13.1 pp | GOOD |
| FY2015 | +23.5 pp | GOOD |
The higher net margin has changed hands between GOOD and INVH over this period.
10 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
INVH's net margin has been more volatile than GOOD's over the 10 comparable fiscal years — 13.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 3.8.
10 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between GOOD and INVH over these 10 fiscal years — GOOD led in 5 and INVH in 5.
10 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
INVH's return on equity has been more volatile than GOOD's over the 11 comparable fiscal years — 4.2 percentage points of standard deviation against 3.9.
11 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between GOOD and INVH over these 11 fiscal years — GOOD led in 10 and INVH in 1.
11 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.