AS vs CTAS
Amer Sports, Inc. and Cintas Corp., side by side — 5 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | AS | CTAS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.6B | $11.3B |
| Net income | $427.4M | $2.0B |
| Gross margin | 57.6% | 50.7% |
| Net margin | 6.7% | 17.8% |
| Return on equity | 7.9% | 40.7% |
| Diluted EPS | $0.76 | $4.91 |
| Dividend / share | · | $1.80 |
| Payout ratio | · | 35.1% |
| Free cash flow | $513.3M | $1.9B |
| Equity | $5.8B | $5.1B |
| Net debt / equity | 0.05× | 0.42× |
| Current ratio | 1.50× | 1.43× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | · | 9.6% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | 12.5% |
CTAS bills 1.7× the revenue of AS, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (17.8% against 6.7%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
5 years side by side
| Fiscal year | AS | CTAS |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $6.6B | $11.3B |
| FY2024 | $5.2B | $10.3B |
| FY2023 | $4.4B | $9.6B |
| FY2022 | $3.6B | $8.8B |
| FY2021 | $3.1B | $7.9B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | AS | CTAS |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $427.4M | $2.0B |
| FY2024 | $72.6M | $1.8B |
| FY2023 | $-208.6M | $1.6B |
| FY2022 | $-252.7M | $1.3B |
| FY2021 | $-126.3M | $1.2B |
5 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −$4,698,561,000 | CTAS |
| FY2024 | −$5,156,881,000 | CTAS |
| FY2023 | −$5,196,215,000 | CTAS |
| FY2022 | −$5,244,569,000 | CTAS |
| FY2021 | −$4,787,959,000 | CTAS |
CTAS has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 5 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.
5 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
5 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −11.0 pp | CTAS |
| FY2024 | −16.0 pp | CTAS |
| FY2023 | −21.1 pp | CTAS |
| FY2022 | −22.4 pp | CTAS |
| FY2021 | −19.9 pp | CTAS |
CTAS has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 5 fiscal years.
5 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
AS's net margin has been more volatile than CTAS's over the 5 comparable fiscal years — 5.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.0.
5 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
CTAS led in net margin in every one of the 5 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.
5 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.