Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / CTAS VS UA

CTAS vs UA

Cintas Corp. and Under Armour, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

CTAS vs UA, at a glance
Metric CTAS UA
Revenue$11.3B$5.0B
Net income$2.0B$-495.6M
Gross margin50.7%45.5%
Net margin17.8%−10.0%
Return on equity40.7%−30.0%
Diluted EPS$4.91−$1.16
Dividend / share$1.80·
Payout ratio35.1%·
Free cash flow$1.9B$-162.2M
Equity$5.1B$1.4B
Net debt / equity0.42×0.62×
Current ratio1.43×1.62×
Revenue CAGR 5y9.6%2.1%
Profit CAGR 5y12.5%·

CTAS bills 2.3× the revenue of UA, and UA closed the last reported year at a loss.

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

CTAS vs UA, revenue by year
Fiscal year CTAS UA
FY2025$11.3B$5.0B
FY2024$10.3B$5.2B
FY2023$9.6B$5.7B
FY2022$8.8B$5.9B
FY2021$7.9B$5.7B
FY2020$7.1B$4.5B
FY2019$7.1B$5.3B
FY2018$6.9B$5.2B
FY2017$6.5B$5.0B
FY2016$5.3B$4.8B
Net income by year

Bottom line

CTAS vs UA, net income by year
Fiscal year CTAS UA
FY2025$2.0B$-495.6M
FY2024$1.8B$-201.3M
FY2023$1.6B$232.0M
FY2022$1.3B$374.5M
FY2021$1.2B$351.0M
FY2020$1.1B$-549.2M
FY2019$876.0M$92.1M
FY2018$885.0M$-46.3M
FY2017$842.6M$-48.3M
FY2016$480.7M$257.0M
Revenue gap over time

18 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$6,298,391,000CTAS
FY2024+$5,175,871,000CTAS
FY2023+$3,894,736,000CTAS
FY2022+$2,912,604,000CTAS
FY2021+$2,171,867,000CTAS
FY2020+$2,641,673,000CTAS
FY2019+$1,817,988,000CTAS
FY2018+$1,699,118,000CTAS
FY2017+$1,487,388,000CTAS
FY2016+$490,043,000CTAS
FY2015+$832,459,000CTAS
FY2014+$1,285,307,000CTAS
FY2013+$1,861,793,000CTAS
FY2012+$2,411,043,000CTAS
FY2011+$2,629,316,000CTAS
FY2010+$2,746,457,000CTAS
FY2009+$2,690,928,000CTAS
FY2008+$3,049,441,000CTAS

CTAS has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 18 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

18 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+27.7 ppCTAS
FY2024+21.4 ppCTAS
FY2023+12.3 ppCTAS
FY2022+8.9 ppCTAS
FY2021+9.6 ppCTAS
FY2020+27.9 ppCTAS
FY2019+10.6 ppCTAS
FY2018+13.7 ppCTAS
FY2017+14.0 ppCTAS
FY2016+3.7 ppCTAS
FY2015+8.6 ppCTAS
FY2014+3.1 ppCTAS
FY2013+2.0 ppCTAS
FY2012+0.4 ppCTAS
FY2011+0.7 ppCTAS
FY2010+0.0 ppCTAS
FY2009+0.6 ppCTAS
FY2008+0.7 ppCTAS

CTAS has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 18 fiscal years.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

UA's net margin has been more volatile than CTAS's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 5.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 4.1.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

CTAS led in net margin in every one of the 18 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

UA's return on equity has been more volatile than CTAS's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 15.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 11.1.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between CTAS and UA over these 18 fiscal years — CTAS led in 12 and UA in 6.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages