Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / CTAS VS LULU

CTAS vs LULU

Cintas Corp. and lululemon athletica Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

CTAS vs LULU, at a glance
Metric CTAS LULU
Revenue$11.3B$11.1B
Net income$2.0B$1.6B
Gross margin50.7%56.6%
Net margin17.8%14.2%
Return on equity40.7%34.0%
Diluted EPS$4.91$13.26
Dividend / share$1.80·
Payout ratio35.1%·
Free cash flow$1.9B$921.7M
Equity$5.1B$5.0B
Net debt / equity0.42×·
Current ratio1.43×2.26×
Revenue CAGR 5y9.6%20.3%
Profit CAGR 5y12.5%21.8%

CTAS and LULU book revenue within 15% of each other, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (17.8% against 14.2%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

CTAS vs LULU, revenue by year
Fiscal year CTAS LULU
FY2025$11.3B$11.1B
FY2024$10.3B$10.6B
FY2023$9.6B$9.6B
FY2022$8.8B$8.1B
FY2021$7.9B$6.3B
FY2020$7.1B$4.4B
FY2019$7.1B$4.0B
FY2018$6.9B$3.3B
FY2017$6.5B$2.6B
FY2016$5.3B$2.3B
Net income by year

Bottom line

CTAS vs LULU, net income by year
Fiscal year CTAS LULU
FY2025$2.0B$1.6B
FY2024$1.8B$1.8B
FY2023$1.6B$1.6B
FY2022$1.3B$854.8M
FY2021$1.2B$975.3M
FY2020$1.1B$588.9M
FY2019$876.0M$645.6M
FY2018$885.0M$483.8M
FY2017$842.6M$258.7M
FY2016$480.7M$303.4M
Revenue gap over time

18 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$162,161,000CTAS
FY2024−$247,945,000LULU
FY2023−$22,663,000LULU
FY2022+$705,251,000CTAS
FY2021+$1,597,842,000CTAS
FY2020+$2,714,461,000CTAS
FY2019+$3,105,824,000CTAS
FY2018+$3,603,984,000CTAS
FY2017+$3,827,451,000CTAS
FY2016+$2,978,989,000CTAS
FY2015+$2,735,249,000CTAS
FY2014+$2,572,464,000CTAS
FY2013+$2,602,656,000CTAS
FY2012+$2,875,606,000CTAS
FY2011+$3,101,161,000CTAS
FY2010+$3,098,680,000CTAS
FY2009+$3,094,441,000CTAS
FY2008+$3,421,197,000CTAS

The higher-revenue side has changed between CTAS and LULU over this period. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

18 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+3.5 ppCTAS
FY2024+0.4 ppCTAS
FY2023+0.3 ppCTAS
FY2022+4.8 ppCTAS
FY2021+0.1 ppCTAS
FY2020+2.2 ppCTAS
FY2019−3.9 ppLULU
FY2018−1.9 ppLULU
FY2017+3.2 ppCTAS
FY2016−3.9 ppLULU
FY2015+1.5 ppCTAS
FY2014−3.4 ppLULU
FY2013−8.6 ppLULU
FY2012−12.3 ppLULU
FY2011−11.4 ppLULU
FY2010−10.7 ppLULU
FY2009−6.8 ppLULU
FY2008−5.1 ppLULU

The higher net margin has changed hands between CTAS and LULU over this period.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

CTAS's net margin has been more volatile than LULU's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 4.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.7.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between CTAS and LULU over these 18 fiscal years — CTAS led in 8 and LULU in 10.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

CTAS's return on equity has been more volatile than LULU's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 11.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 7.0.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between CTAS and LULU over these 18 fiscal years — CTAS led in 5 and LULU in 13.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages