ATMP vs BCS
Barclays Bank PLC and Barclays PLC, side by side — 8 fiscal years reported in GBP, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | ATMP | BCS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | £9.7B | £11.1B |
| Net income | £4.7B | £7.2B |
| Gross margin | · | · |
| Net margin | 48.0% | 64.9% |
| Return on equity | 7.7% | 9.6% |
| Diluted EPS | · | £0.42 |
| Dividend / share | £1.10 | · |
| Payout ratio | 55.2% | · |
| Free cash flow | · | · |
| Equity | · | £77.8B |
| Net debt / equity | · | · |
| Current ratio | · | · |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.9% | 5.4% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | 13.7% | 24.7% |
ATMP and BCS book revenue within 15% of each other, and BCS keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (64.9% against 48.0%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
8 years side by side
| Fiscal year | ATMP | BCS |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | £9.7B | £11.1B |
| FY2024 | £9.3B | £10.7B |
| FY2023 | £8.6B | £10.0B |
| FY2022 | £8.0B | £9.5B |
| FY2021 | £8.5B | £9.8B |
| FY2020 | £7.3B | £8.5B |
| FY2019 | £7.5B | £9.0B |
| FY2018 | £7.3B | £8.8B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | ATMP | BCS |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | £4.7B | £7.2B |
| FY2024 | £3.7B | £6.3B |
| FY2023 | £3.6B | £5.3B |
| FY2022 | £4.4B | £5.9B |
| FY2021 | £4.6B | £7.0B |
| FY2020 | £2.5B | £2.4B |
| FY2019 | £2.8B | £3.3B |
| FY2018 | £1.0B | £2.3B |
8 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −£1,403,000,000 | BCS |
| FY2024 | −£1,361,000,000 | BCS |
| FY2023 | −£1,413,000,000 | BCS |
| FY2022 | −£1,465,000,000 | BCS |
| FY2021 | −£1,299,000,000 | BCS |
| FY2020 | −£1,224,000,000 | BCS |
| FY2019 | −£1,457,000,000 | BCS |
| FY2018 | −£1,501,000,000 | BCS |
BCS has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 8 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.
8 of 8 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
8 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −16.9 pp | BCS |
| FY2024 | −19.3 pp | BCS |
| FY2023 | −11.8 pp | BCS |
| FY2022 | −8.3 pp | BCS |
| FY2021 | −18.1 pp | BCS |
| FY2020 | +4.7 pp | ATMP |
| FY2019 | −0.4 pp | BCS |
| FY2018 | −15.6 pp | BCS |
The higher net margin has changed hands between ATMP and BCS over this period.
8 of 8 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
BCS's net margin has been more volatile than ATMP's over the 8 comparable fiscal years — 15.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 12.3.
8 of 8 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between ATMP and BCS over these 8 fiscal years — ATMP led in 1 and BCS in 7.
8 of 8 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
BCS's return on equity has been more volatile than ATMP's over the 10 comparable fiscal years — 3.6 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.9.
10 of 11 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between ATMP and BCS over these 10 fiscal years — ATMP led in 4 and BCS in 6.
10 of 11 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.