Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / ATO VS MDU

ATO vs MDU

Atmos Energy Corp. and MDU Resources Group Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

ATO vs MDU, at a glance
Metric ATO MDU
Revenue$4.7B$1.9B
Net income$1.2B$190.4M
Gross margin··
Net margin25.5%10.2%
Return on equity9.3%7.0%
Diluted EPS$7.46$0.93
Dividend / share$3.48$0.54
Payout ratio46.2%56.9%
Free cash flow$-1.5B$-297.0M
Equity$13.6B$2.8B
Net debt / equity0.64×0.96×
Current ratio0.77×0.84×
Revenue CAGR 5y10.8%−19.5%
Profit CAGR 5y14.8%−13.4%

ATO bills 2.5× the revenue of MDU, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (25.5% against 10.2%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

ATO vs MDU, revenue by year
Fiscal year ATO MDU
FY2025$4.7B$1.9B
FY2024$4.2B$1.8B
FY2023$4.3B$1.8B
FY2022$4.2B$1.8B
FY2021$3.4B$3.5B
FY2020$2.8B$5.5B
FY2019$2.9B$5.3B
FY2018$3.1B$4.5B
FY2017$2.8B$4.4B
FY2016$2.5B$4.1B
Net income by year

Bottom line

ATO vs MDU, net income by year
Fiscal year ATO MDU
FY2025$1.2B$190.4M
FY2024$1.0B$281.1M
FY2023$885.9M$414.7M
FY2022$774.4M$367.5M
FY2021$665.6M$378.1M
FY2020$601.4M$390.2M
FY2019$511.4M$335.5M
FY2018$603.1M$272.3M
FY2017$396.4M$281.2M
FY2016$350.1M$-67.3M
Revenue gap over time

17 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$2,827,689,000ATO
FY2024+$2,407,209,000ATO
FY2023+$2,469,550,000ATO
FY2022+$2,447,504,000ATO
FY2021−$46,946,000MDU
FY2020−$2,711,613,000MDU
FY2019−$2,434,928,000MDU
FY2018−$1,416,006,000MDU
FY2017−$1,683,616,000MDU
FY2016−$1,674,180,000MDU
FY2015−$1,087,067,000MDU
FY2014+$825,843,000ATO
FY2013−$44,711,000MDU
FY2012−$639,269,000MDU
FY2011+$235,943,000ATO
FY2010+$751,365,000ATO
FY2009+$692,610,000ATO

The higher-revenue side has changed between ATO and MDU over this period. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

17 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+15.3 ppATO
FY2024+9.0 ppATO
FY2023−2.2 ppMDU
FY2022−2.5 ppMDU
FY2021+8.6 ppATO
FY2020+14.3 ppATO
FY2019+11.3 ppATO
FY2018+13.3 ppATO
FY2017+8.0 ppATO
FY2016+15.9 ppATO
FY2015+27.1 ppATO
FY2014−1.3 ppMDU
FY2013−0.8 ppMDU
FY2012+6.3 ppATO
FY2011−0.4 ppMDU
FY2010−1.7 ppMDU
FY2009+6.9 ppATO

The higher net margin has changed hands between ATO and MDU over this period.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

MDU's net margin has been more volatile than ATO's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 8.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 7.3.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between ATO and MDU over these 17 fiscal years — ATO led in 11 and MDU in 6.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

MDU's return on equity has been more volatile than ATO's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 9.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.2.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between ATO and MDU over these 18 fiscal years — ATO led in 9 and MDU in 9.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages