Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / LNG VS MDU

LNG vs MDU

Cheniere Energy, Inc. and MDU Resources Group Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

LNG vs MDU, at a glance
Metric LNG MDU
Revenue$20.0B$1.9B
Net income$5.3B$190.4M
Gross margin64.2%·
Net margin34.0%10.2%
Return on equity78.3%7.0%
Diluted EPS$24.13$0.93
Dividend / share·$0.54
Payout ratio8.5%56.9%
Free cash flow$2.5B$-297.0M
Equity$7.9B$2.8B
Net debt / equity2.74×0.96×
Current ratio0.94×0.84×
Revenue CAGR 5y16.4%−19.5%
Profit CAGR 5y·−13.4%

LNG bills 10.7× the revenue of MDU, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (34.0% against 10.2%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

LNG vs MDU, revenue by year
Fiscal year LNG MDU
FY2025$20.0B$1.9B
FY2024$15.7B$1.8B
FY2023$20.4B$1.8B
FY2022$33.4B$1.8B
FY2021$17.5B$3.5B
FY2020$9.4B$5.5B
FY2019$9.7B$5.3B
FY2018$8.0B$4.5B
FY2017$5.6B$4.4B
FY2016$1.3B$4.1B
Net income by year

Bottom line

LNG vs MDU, net income by year
Fiscal year LNG MDU
FY2025$5.3B$190.4M
FY2024$3.3B$281.1M
FY2023$9.9B$414.7M
FY2022$1.4B$367.5M
FY2021$-2.3B$378.1M
FY2020$-85.0M$390.2M
FY2019$648.0M$335.5M
FY2018$471.0M$272.3M
FY2017$-393.0M$281.2M
FY2016$-610.0M$-67.3M
Revenue gap over time

17 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$18,100,934,000LNG
FY2024+$13,945,022,000LNG
FY2023+$18,588,193,000LNG
FY2022+$31,673,842,000LNG
FY2021+$14,076,564,000LNG
FY2020+$3,825,250,000LNG
FY2019+$4,393,224,000LNG
FY2018+$3,455,448,000LNG
FY2017+$1,201,649,000LNG
FY2016−$2,845,828,000MDU
FY2015−$3,743,052,000MDU
FY2014−$3,847,119,000MDU
FY2013−$3,652,958,000MDU
FY2012−$3,809,211,000MDU
FY2011−$3,760,048,000MDU
FY2010−$3,618,182,000MDU
FY2009−$3,995,375,000MDU

The higher-revenue side has changed between LNG and MDU over this period. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

17 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+23.9 ppLNG
FY2024+12.6 ppLNG
FY2023+36.2 ppLNG
FY2022−13.1 ppMDU
FY2021−19.9 ppMDU
FY2020−1.7 ppMDU
FY2019+6.4 ppLNG
FY2018+9.0 ppLNG
FY2017+3.6 ppLNG
FY2016−50.2 ppMDU
FY2015−388.4 ppMDU
FY2014−265.4 ppMDU
FY2013−216.2 ppMDU
FY2012−129.8 ppMDU
FY2011−75.3 ppMDU
FY2010−33.0 ppMDU
FY2009−89.6 ppMDU

The higher net margin has changed hands between LNG and MDU over this period.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

LNG's net margin has been more volatile than MDU's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 120.2 percentage points of standard deviation against 8.8.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between LNG and MDU over these 17 fiscal years — LNG led in 6 and MDU in 11.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

LNG's return on equity has been more volatile than MDU's over the 3 comparable fiscal years — 102.4 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.5.

3 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between LNG and MDU over these 3 fiscal years — LNG led in 2 and MDU in 1.

3 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages