Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / ATR VS CSL

ATR vs CSL

Aptargroup, Inc. and Carlisle Companies Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

ATR vs CSL, at a glance
Metric ATR CSL
Revenue$3.8B$5.0B
Net income$392.8M$740.7M
Gross margin37.2%35.7%
Net margin10.4%14.8%
Return on equity15.3%34.8%
Diluted EPS$5.89$17.12
Dividend / share$1.83$4.20
Payout ratio30.8%24.4%
Free cash flow$299.6M$970.6M
Equity$2.7B$1.8B
Net debt / equity0.35×0.99×
Current ratio1.62×3.09×
Revenue CAGR 5y5.2%4.8%
Profit CAGR 5y12.9%18.3%

CSL bills 1.3× the revenue of ATR, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (14.8% against 10.4%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

ATR vs CSL, revenue by year
Fiscal year ATR CSL
FY2025$3.8B$5.0B
FY2024$3.6B$5.0B
FY2023$3.5B$4.6B
FY2022$3.3B$5.4B
FY2021$3.2B$3.8B
FY2020$2.9B$4.0B
FY2019$2.9B$4.5B
FY2018$2.8B$4.5B
FY2017$2.5B$3.8B
FY2016$2.3B$3.4B
Net income by year

Bottom line

ATR vs CSL, net income by year
Fiscal year ATR CSL
FY2025$392.8M$740.7M
FY2024$374.5M$1.3B
FY2023$284.5M$767.4M
FY2022$239.3M$924.0M
FY2021$244.1M$421.7M
FY2020$214.0M$320.1M
FY2019$242.2M$472.8M
FY2018$194.8M$611.1M
FY2017$220.0M$365.5M
FY2016$205.6M$250.1M
Revenue gap over time

18 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$1,242,719,000CSL
FY2024−$1,420,710,000CSL
FY2023−$1,099,450,000CSL
FY2022−$2,127,151,000CSL
FY2021−$609,479,000CSL
FY2020−$1,040,560,000CSL
FY2019−$1,624,868,000CSL
FY2018−$1,714,739,000CSL
FY2017−$1,281,517,000CSL
FY2016−$1,094,266,000CSL
FY2015−$1,226,051,000CSL
FY2014−$606,191,000CSL
FY2013−$422,987,000CSL
FY2012−$520,164,000CSL
FY2011−$155,217,000CSL
FY2010−$437,190,000CSL
FY2009−$402,710,000CSL
FY2008−$792,915,000CSL

CSL has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 18 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

18 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−4.4 ppCSL
FY2024−15.8 ppCSL
FY2023−8.6 ppCSL
FY2022−9.7 ppCSL
FY2021−3.4 ppCSL
FY2020−0.8 ppCSL
FY2019−2.1 ppCSL
FY2018−6.6 ppCSL
FY2017−0.8 ppCSL
FY2016+1.5 ppATR
FY2015−0.4 ppCSL
FY2014−0.5 ppCSL
FY2013−0.3 ppCSL
FY2012−2.5 ppCSL
FY2011+0.6 ppATR
FY2010+2.5 ppATR
FY2009+0.3 ppATR
FY2008+5.5 ppATR

The higher net margin has changed hands between ATR and CSL over this period.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

CSL's net margin has been more volatile than ATR's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 5.4 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.1.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between ATR and CSL over these 18 fiscal years — ATR led in 5 and CSL in 13.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

CSL's return on equity has been more volatile than ATR's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 10.7 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.1.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between ATR and CSL over these 18 fiscal years — ATR led in 9 and CSL in 9.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages