ATR vs NKE
AptarGroup, Inc. and Nike, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
At a glance
Most recent reported year
| Metric | ATR | NKE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.8B | $46.4B |
| Net income | $392.8M | $3.1B |
| Gross margin | 30.9% | 42.9% |
| Net margin | 10.4% | 6.7% |
| Return on equity | 15.3% | 22.1% |
| Diluted EPS | $5.89 | $2.10 |
| Dividend / share | $1.83 | $1.63 |
| Payout ratio | 30.8% | 77.4% |
| Free cash flow | $299.6M | $2.2B |
| Equity | $2.7B | $14.9B |
| Net debt / equity | 0.35× | 0.03× |
| Current ratio | 1.62× | 1.96× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 5.2% | 0.8% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | 12.9% | −11.5% |
NKE bills 12.3× the revenue of ATR, and ATR keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (10.4% against 6.7%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner.
Advertisement
AdSense · Leaderboard 728×90 · responsive
Revenue by year
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | ATR | NKE |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $3.8B | $46.4B |
| FY2024 | $3.6B | $46.3B |
| FY2023 | $3.5B | $51.4B |
| FY2022 | $3.3B | $51.2B |
| FY2021 | $3.2B | $46.7B |
| FY2020 | $2.9B | $44.5B |
| FY2019 | $2.9B | $37.4B |
| FY2018 | $2.8B | $39.1B |
| FY2017 | $2.5B | $36.4B |
| FY2016 | $2.3B | $34.4B |
Net income by year
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | ATR | NKE |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $392.8M | $3.1B |
| FY2024 | $374.5M | $3.2B |
| FY2023 | $284.5M | $5.7B |
| FY2022 | $239.3M | $5.1B |
| FY2021 | $244.1M | $6.0B |
| FY2020 | $214.0M | $5.7B |
| FY2019 | $242.2M | $2.5B |
| FY2018 | $194.8M | $4.0B |
| FY2017 | $220.0M | $1.9B |
| FY2016 | $205.6M | $4.2B |
Advertisement
AdSense · Rectangle 336×280