BBUC vs IESC
Brookfield Business Partners L.p. and IES Holdings, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | BBUC | IESC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $27.5B | $3.4B |
| Net income | $387.0M | $306.0M |
| Gross margin | · | 25.5% |
| Net margin | 1.4% | 9.2% |
| Return on equity | · | 40.9% |
| Diluted EPS | −$0.30 | $15.02 |
| Dividend / share | · | · |
| Payout ratio | · | · |
| Free cash flow | · | $218.8M |
| Equity | · | $884.0M |
| Net debt / equity | 2.63× | −0.14× |
| Current ratio | 1.67× | 1.71× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | −6.1% | 23.1% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | −7.8% | 49.0% |
BBUC bills 8.1× the revenue of IESC, and IESC keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (9.2% against 1.4%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | BBUC | IESC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $27.5B | $3.4B |
| FY2024 | $40.6B | $2.9B |
| FY2023 | $55.1B | $2.4B |
| FY2022 | $57.4B | $2.2B |
| FY2021 | $46.6B | $1.5B |
| FY2020 | $37.6B | $1.2B |
| FY2019 | $43.0B | $1.1B |
| FY2018 | $37.2B | $876.8M |
| FY2017 | $22.8B | $810.7M |
| FY2016 | $8.0B | $696.0M |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | BBUC | IESC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $387.0M | $306.0M |
| FY2024 | $895.0M | $219.1M |
| FY2023 | $3.8B | $108.3M |
| FY2022 | $240.0M | $34.8M |
| FY2021 | $2.2B | $66.7M |
| FY2020 | $580.0M | $41.6M |
| FY2019 | $434.0M | $33.2M |
| FY2018 | $1.2B | $-14.2M |
| FY2017 | $215.0M | $13.4M |
| FY2016 | $-35.0M | $120.8M |
11 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +$24,085,532,000 | BBUC |
| FY2024 | +$37,735,642,000 | BBUC |
| FY2023 | +$52,690,773,000 | BBUC |
| FY2022 | +$55,218,192,000 | BBUC |
| FY2021 | +$45,050,507,000 | BBUC |
| FY2020 | +$36,444,144,000 | BBUC |
| FY2019 | +$41,955,004,000 | BBUC |
| FY2018 | +$36,291,172,000 | BBUC |
| FY2017 | +$22,012,256,000 | BBUC |
| FY2016 | +$7,264,007,000 | BBUC |
| FY2015 | +$6,179,143,000 | BBUC |
BBUC has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 11 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
11 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
11 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −7.8 pp | IESC |
| FY2024 | −5.9 pp | IESC |
| FY2023 | +1.8 pp | BBUC |
| FY2022 | −1.4 pp | IESC |
| FY2021 | +0.2 pp | BBUC |
| FY2020 | −1.9 pp | IESC |
| FY2019 | −2.1 pp | IESC |
| FY2018 | +4.8 pp | BBUC |
| FY2017 | −0.7 pp | IESC |
| FY2016 | −19.9 pp | IESC |
| FY2015 | +1.1 pp | BBUC |
The higher net margin has changed hands between BBUC and IESC over this period.
11 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
IESC's net margin has been more volatile than BBUC's over the 11 comparable fiscal years — 4.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.4.
11 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between BBUC and IESC over these 11 fiscal years — BBUC led in 4 and IESC in 7.
11 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
IESC's return on equity has been more volatile than BBUC's over the 4 comparable fiscal years — 30.9 percentage points of standard deviation against 3.1.
4 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between BBUC and IESC over these 4 fiscal years — BBUC led in 1 and IESC in 3.
4 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.