CURLF vs MDWD
Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. and MediWound Ltd., side by side — 5 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | CURLF | MDWD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $17.0M |
| Net income | $-231.1M | $-23.9M |
| Gross margin | 49.8% | 19.2% |
| Net margin | −18.0% | −140.8% |
| Return on equity | −28.6% | −63.9% |
| Diluted EPS | −$0.35 | −$2.10 |
| Dividend / share | · | · |
| Payout ratio | · | · |
| Free cash flow | $74.3M | $-21.6M |
| Equity | $756.4M | · |
| Net debt / equity | 0.59× | · |
| Current ratio | 1.52× | 2.33× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | · | −4.9% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | · |
CURLF bills 74.8× the revenue of MDWD, and both closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
5 years side by side
| Fiscal year | CURLF | MDWD |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $1.3B | $17.0M |
| FY2024 | $1.3B | $20.2M |
| FY2023 | $1.3B | $18.7M |
| FY2022 | $1.3B | $26.5M |
| FY2021 | $1.2B | $23.8M |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | CURLF | MDWD |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $-231.1M | $-23.9M |
| FY2024 | $-215.4M | $-30.2M |
| FY2023 | $-281.2M | $-6.7M |
| FY2022 | $-370.1M | $-19.6M |
| FY2021 | $-205.9M | $-13.6M |
5 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +$1,251,176,000 | CURLF |
| FY2024 | +$1,314,077,000 | CURLF |
| FY2023 | +$1,327,946,000 | CURLF |
| FY2022 | +$1,248,924,000 | CURLF |
| FY2021 | +$1,172,224,000 | CURLF |
CURLF has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 5 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
5 of 11 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
5 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +122.8 pp | CURLF |
| FY2024 | +132.8 pp | CURLF |
| FY2023 | +14.4 pp | CURLF |
| FY2022 | +44.4 pp | CURLF |
| FY2021 | +39.1 pp | CURLF |
CURLF has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 5 fiscal years.
5 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
MDWD's net margin has been more volatile than CURLF's over the 5 comparable fiscal years — 45.5 percentage points of standard deviation against 4.7.
5 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
CURLF led in net margin in every one of the 5 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.
5 of 10 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
MDWD's return on equity has been more volatile than CURLF's over the 3 comparable fiscal years — 26.4 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.6.
3 of 11 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
CURLF led in return on equity in every one of the 3 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.
3 of 11 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.