Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / CAH VS HKPD

CAH vs HKPD

Cardinal Health Inc. and Cellyan Biotechnology Co. Ltd., side by side — 3 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

CAH vs HKPD, at a glance
Metric CAH HKPD
Revenue$254.2B$20.3M
Net income$1.7B$-27,056
Gross margin3.8%11.9%
Net margin0.7%−0.1%
Return on equity·−0.6%
Diluted EPS$7.23−$0.00
Dividend / share$2.04·
Payout ratio28.6%·
Free cash flow$4.5B$499,298
Equity$-2.9B$5.0M
Net debt / equity·0.23×
Current ratio0.88×2.99×
Revenue CAGR 5y9.4%·
Profit CAGR 5y22.9%·

CAH bills 12516.0× the revenue of HKPD, and HKPD closed the last reported year at a loss.

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

3 years side by side

CAH vs HKPD, revenue by year
Fiscal year CAH HKPD
FY2024$222.6B$20.3M
FY2023$226.8B$16.7M
FY2022$205.0B$12.6M
Net income by year

Bottom line

CAH vs HKPD, net income by year
Fiscal year CAH HKPD
FY2024$1.6B$-27,056
FY2023$852.0M$1.3M
FY2022$330.0M$998,196
Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

HKPD's net margin has been more volatile than CAH's over the 3 comparable fiscal years — 3.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 0.2.

3 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between CAH and HKPD over these 3 fiscal years — CAH led in 1 and HKPD in 2.

3 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages