Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / MCK VS NUS

MCK vs NUS

McKesson Corp. and NU Skin Enterprises, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

MCK vs NUS, at a glance
Metric MCK NUS
Revenue$403.4B$1.5B
Net income$4.8B$160.2M
Gross margin3.6%69.4%
Net margin1.3%10.8%
Return on equity·22.0%
Diluted EPS$38.38$3.18
Dividend / share$3.17·
Payout ratio8.0%7.4%
Free cash flow$5.7B$46.0M
Equity$-2.2B$805.2M
Net debt / equity·−0.02×
Current ratio0.85×2.08×
Revenue CAGR 5y11.1%−10.5%
Profit CAGR 5y·−3.5%

MCK bills 271.6× the revenue of NUS, and NUS keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (10.8% against 1.3%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

MCK vs NUS, revenue by year
Fiscal year MCK NUS
FY2025$403.4B$1.5B
FY2024$359.1B$1.7B
FY2023$309.0B$2.0B
FY2022$276.7B$2.2B
FY2021$264.0B$2.7B
FY2020$238.2B$2.6B
FY2019$231.1B$2.4B
FY2018$214.3B$2.7B
FY2017$208.4B$2.3B
FY2016$198.5B$2.2B
Net income by year

Bottom line

MCK vs NUS, net income by year
Fiscal year MCK NUS
FY2025$4.8B$160.2M
FY2024$3.3B$-146.6M
FY2023$3.0B$8.6M
FY2022$3.6B$104.8M
FY2021$1.1B$147.3M
FY2020$-4.5B$191.4M
FY2019$900.0M$173.6M
FY2018$34.0M$121.9M
FY2017$67.0M$129.4M
FY2016$5.1B$143.1M
Revenue gap over time

17 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$401,944,841,000MCK
FY2024+$357,318,916,000MCK
FY2023+$306,981,869,000MCK
FY2022+$274,485,341,000MCK
FY2021+$261,270,331,000MCK
FY2020+$235,646,066,000MCK
FY2019+$228,630,584,000MCK
FY2018+$211,639,992,000MCK
FY2017+$206,077,901,000MCK
FY2016+$196,325,203,000MCK
FY2015+$188,636,953,000MCK
FY2014+$176,475,505,000MCK
FY2013+$134,215,282,000MCK
FY2012+$120,063,743,000MCK
FY2011+$120,601,412,000MCK
FY2010+$110,546,741,000MCK
FY2009+$107,370,942,000MCK

MCK has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 17 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

17 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−9.5 ppNUS
FY2024+9.4 ppMCK
FY2023+0.6 ppMCK
FY2022−3.4 ppNUS
FY2021−5.0 ppNUS
FY2020−9.2 ppNUS
FY2019−6.7 ppNUS
FY2018−4.4 ppNUS
FY2017−5.5 ppNUS
FY2016−3.9 ppNUS
FY2015−4.7 ppNUS
FY2014−6.5 ppNUS
FY2013−10.6 ppNUS
FY2012−9.3 ppNUS
FY2011−7.8 ppNUS
FY2010−7.8 ppNUS
FY2009−5.6 ppNUS

The higher net margin has changed hands between MCK and NUS over this period.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

NUS's net margin has been more volatile than MCK's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 4.5 percentage points of standard deviation against 0.9.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between MCK and NUS over these 17 fiscal years — MCK led in 2 and NUS in 15.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

MCK's return on equity has been more volatile than NUS's over the 12 comparable fiscal years — 12.3 percentage points of standard deviation against 9.9.

12 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between MCK and NUS over these 12 fiscal years — MCK led in 2 and NUS in 10.

12 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages