Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / CAH VS MCK

CAH vs MCK

Cardinal Health Inc. and McKesson Corp., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

CAH vs MCK, at a glance
Metric CAH MCK
Revenue$254.2B$403.4B
Net income$1.7B$4.8B
Gross margin3.8%3.6%
Net margin0.7%1.3%
Return on equity··
Diluted EPS$7.23$38.38
Dividend / share$2.04$3.17
Payout ratio28.6%8.0%
Free cash flow$4.5B$5.7B
Equity$-2.9B$-2.2B
Net debt / equity··
Current ratio0.88×0.85×
Revenue CAGR 5y9.4%11.1%
Profit CAGR 5y22.9%·

MCK bills 1.6× the revenue of CAH, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (1.3% against 0.7%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

CAH vs MCK, revenue by year
Fiscal year CAH MCK
FY2025$254.2B$403.4B
FY2024$222.6B$359.1B
FY2023$226.8B$309.0B
FY2022$205.0B$276.7B
FY2021$181.3B$264.0B
FY2020$162.5B$238.2B
FY2019$152.9B$231.1B
FY2018$145.5B$214.3B
FY2017$136.8B$208.4B
FY2016$130.0B$198.5B
Net income by year

Bottom line

CAH vs MCK, net income by year
Fiscal year CAH MCK
FY2025$1.7B$4.8B
FY2024$1.6B$3.3B
FY2023$852.0M$3.0B
FY2022$330.0M$3.6B
FY2021$-938.0M$1.1B
FY2020$611.0M$-4.5B
FY2019$-3.7B$900.0M
FY2018$1.4B$34.0M
FY2017$256.0M$67.0M
FY2016$1.3B$5.1B
Revenue gap over time

19 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$149,182,000,000MCK
FY2024−$136,473,000,000MCK
FY2023−$82,124,000,000MCK
FY2022−$71,732,000,000MCK
FY2021−$82,640,000,000MCK
FY2020−$75,761,000,000MCK
FY2019−$78,129,000,000MCK
FY2018−$68,785,000,000MCK
FY2017−$71,548,000,000MCK
FY2016−$68,557,000,000MCK
FY2015−$69,338,000,000MCK
FY2014−$76,514,000,000MCK
FY2013−$46,308,000,000MCK
FY2012−$21,103,000,000MCK
FY2011−$14,769,000,000MCK
FY2010−$9,440,000,000MCK
FY2009−$10,199,000,000MCK
FY2008−$10,640,500,000MCK
FY2007−$14,294,800,000MCK

MCK has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 19 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

18 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−0.6 ppMCK
FY2024−0.3 ppMCK
FY2023−0.6 ppMCK
FY2022−1.2 ppMCK
FY2021−1.0 ppMCK
FY2020+2.2 ppCAH
FY2019−2.9 ppMCK
FY2018+0.8 ppCAH
FY2017+0.0 ppCAH
FY2016−1.6 ppMCK
FY2015−0.0 ppMCK
FY2014+0.3 ppCAH
FY2013+0.4 ppCAH
FY2012−0.8 ppMCK
FY2011−0.2 ppMCK
FY2010−0.1 ppMCK
FY2009−0.5 ppMCK
FY2008+0.4 ppCAH

The higher net margin has changed hands between CAH and MCK over this period.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

CAH's net margin has been more volatile than MCK's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 0.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 0.8.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between CAH and MCK over these 18 fiscal years — CAH led in 6 and MCK in 12.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

CAH's return on equity has been more volatile than MCK's over the 13 comparable fiscal years — 28.9 percentage points of standard deviation against 11.8.

13 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between CAH and MCK over these 13 fiscal years — CAH led in 7 and MCK in 6.

13 of 14 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages