CDTG vs OPAL
CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Ltd. and Opal Fuels Inc., side by side — 5 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | CDTG | OPAL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.2M | $349.0M |
| Net income | $-10.2M | $36.4M |
| Gross margin | 41.5% | · |
| Net margin | −56.9% | 10.4% |
| Return on equity | −30.0% | · |
| Diluted EPS | −$0.84 | $0.15 |
| Dividend / share | · | · |
| Payout ratio | · | · |
| Free cash flow | $-1.5M | $-34.2M |
| Equity | $30.6M | $-12.9M |
| Net debt / equity | · | · |
| Current ratio | 1.46× | 1.18× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | · | · |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | · |
OPAL bills 19.1× the revenue of CDTG, and CDTG closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
5 years side by side
| Fiscal year | CDTG | OPAL |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $18.2M | $349.0M |
| FY2024 | $29.8M | $300.0M |
| FY2023 | $34.2M | $256.1M |
| FY2022 | $28.8M | $235.5M |
| FY2021 | $23.6M | $166.1M |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | CDTG | OPAL |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $-10.2M | $36.4M |
| FY2024 | $1.5M | $14.3M |
| FY2023 | $7.4M | $127.0M |
| FY2022 | $5.8M | $32.6M |
| FY2021 | $6.8M | $40.8M |
5 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −$330,749,181 | OPAL |
| FY2024 | −$270,206,795 | OPAL |
| FY2023 | −$221,898,081 | OPAL |
| FY2022 | −$206,681,638 | OPAL |
| FY2021 | −$142,567,180 | OPAL |
OPAL has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 5 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
5 of 5 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
5 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −67.3 pp | OPAL |
| FY2024 | −0.1 pp | OPAL |
| FY2023 | −29.1 pp | OPAL |
| FY2022 | +4.3 pp | CDTG |
| FY2021 | +3.4 pp | CDTG |
The higher net margin has changed hands between CDTG and OPAL over this period.
5 of 5 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
CDTG's net margin has been more volatile than OPAL's over the 5 comparable fiscal years — 30.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 15.8.
5 of 5 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between CDTG and OPAL over these 5 fiscal years — CDTG led in 2 and OPAL in 3.
5 of 5 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.