Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / CDW VS ULTA

CDW vs ULTA

CDW Corp. and Ulta Beauty, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

CDW vs ULTA, at a glance
Metric CDW ULTA
Revenue$22.4B$12.4B
Net income$1.1B$1.2B
Gross margin21.7%39.1%
Net margin4.8%9.3%
Return on equity43.0%43.6%
Diluted EPS$8.08$25.64
Dividend / share$2.50·
Payout ratio30.8%·
Free cash flow$1.1B$1.1B
Equity$2.6B$2.8B
Net debt / equity1.92×−0.13×
Current ratio1.18×1.41×
Revenue CAGR 5y4.0%15.0%
Profit CAGR 5y6.2%45.7%

CDW bills 1.8× the revenue of ULTA, and ULTA keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (9.3% against 4.8%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

CDW vs ULTA, revenue by year
Fiscal year CDW ULTA
FY2025$22.4B$12.4B
FY2024$21.0B$11.3B
FY2023$21.4B$11.2B
FY2022$23.7B$10.2B
FY2021$20.8B$8.6B
FY2020$18.5B$6.2B
FY2019$18.0B$7.4B
FY2018$16.2B$6.7B
FY2017$14.8B$5.9B
FY2016$13.7B$4.9B
Net income by year

Bottom line

CDW vs ULTA, net income by year
Fiscal year CDW ULTA
FY2025$1.1B$1.2B
FY2024$1.1B$1.2B
FY2023$1.1B$1.3B
FY2022$1.1B$1.2B
FY2021$988.6M$985.8M
FY2020$788.5M$175.8M
FY2019$736.8M$705.9M
FY2018$643.0M$658.6M
FY2017$523.1M$555.2M
FY2016$425.1M$409.8M
Revenue gap over time

17 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$10,031,280,000CDW
FY2024+$9,703,046,000CDW
FY2023+$10,168,697,000CDW
FY2022+$13,540,120,000CDW
FY2021+$12,189,911,000CDW
FY2020+$12,315,547,000CDW
FY2019+$10,634,332,000CDW
FY2018+$9,523,885,000CDW
FY2017+$8,948,394,000CDW
FY2016+$8,817,963,000CDW
FY2015+$9,064,584,000CDW
FY2014+$8,833,131,000CDW
FY2013+$8,098,027,000CDW
FY2012+$7,907,944,000CDW
FY2011+$7,826,249,000CDW
FY2010+$7,346,362,000CDW
FY2009+$5,939,829,000CDW

CDW has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 17 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

17 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−4.6 ppULTA
FY2024−5.5 ppULTA
FY2023−6.4 ppULTA
FY2022−7.5 ppULTA
FY2021−6.7 ppULTA
FY2020+1.4 ppCDW
FY2019−5.5 ppULTA
FY2018−5.8 ppULTA
FY2017−5.9 ppULTA
FY2016−5.3 ppULTA
FY2015−5.1 ppULTA
FY2014−5.9 ppULTA
FY2013−6.4 ppULTA
FY2012−6.6 ppULTA
FY2011−6.6 ppULTA
FY2010−5.2 ppULTA
FY2009−8.4 ppULTA

The higher net margin has changed hands between CDW and ULTA over this period.

17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

ULTA's net margin has been more volatile than CDW's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 2.6 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.6.

17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between CDW and ULTA over these 17 fiscal years — CDW led in 1 and ULTA in 16.

17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

CDW's return on equity has been more volatile than ULTA's over the 13 comparable fiscal years — 21.9 percentage points of standard deviation against 17.0.

13 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between CDW and ULTA over these 13 fiscal years — CDW led in 10 and ULTA in 3.

13 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages