Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / CHRW VS EXPE

CHRW vs EXPE

C. H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and Expedia Group, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

CHRW vs EXPE, at a glance
Metric CHRW EXPE
Revenue$16.2B$14.7B
Net income$587.1M$1.3B
Gross margin·90.1%
Net margin3.6%8.8%
Return on equity32.9%91.1%
Diluted EPS$4.83$9.81
Dividend / share$2.49$1.60
Payout ratio51.3%15.5%
Free cash flow$894.9M$3.1B
Equity$1.8B$1.3B
Net debt / equity0.50×0.58×
Current ratio1.53×0.73×
Revenue CAGR 5y0.0%23.2%
Profit CAGR 5y3.0%·

CHRW and EXPE book revenue within 15% of each other, and EXPE keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (8.8% against 3.6%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

CHRW vs EXPE, revenue by year
Fiscal year CHRW EXPE
FY2025$16.2B$14.7B
FY2024$17.7B$13.7B
FY2023$17.6B$12.8B
FY2022$24.7B$11.7B
FY2021$23.1B$8.6B
FY2020$16.2B$5.2B
FY2019$15.3B$12.1B
FY2018$16.6B$11.2B
FY2017$14.9B$10.1B
FY2016$13.1B$8.8B
Net income by year

Bottom line

CHRW vs EXPE, net income by year
Fiscal year CHRW EXPE
FY2025$587.1M$1.3B
FY2024$465.7M$1.2B
FY2023$325.1M$797.0M
FY2022$940.5M$352.0M
FY2021$844.2M$12.0M
FY2020$506.4M$-2.6B
FY2019$577.0M$565.0M
FY2018$664.5M$406.0M
FY2017$504.9M$378.0M
FY2016$513.4M$282.0M
Revenue gap over time

18 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$1,499,763,000CHRW
FY2024+$4,033,956,000CHRW
FY2023+$4,757,443,000CHRW
FY2022+$13,029,625,000CHRW
FY2021+$14,504,138,000CHRW
FY2020+$11,008,106,000CHRW
FY2019+$3,242,508,000CHRW
FY2018+$5,408,172,000CHRW
FY2017+$4,809,380,000CHRW
FY2016+$4,370,413,000CHRW
FY2015+$6,803,767,000CHRW
FY2014+$7,706,582,000CHRW
FY2013+$7,980,817,000CHRW
FY2012+$7,328,766,000CHRW
FY2011+$6,887,337,000CHRW
FY2010+$6,240,660,000CHRW
FY2009+$4,834,138,000CHRW
FY2008+$5,641,601,000CHRW

CHRW has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 18 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

18 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−5.2 ppEXPE
FY2024−6.3 ppEXPE
FY2023−3.5 ppEXPE
FY2022+0.9 ppCHRW
FY2021+3.5 ppCHRW
FY2020+55.6 ppCHRW
FY2019−1.0 ppEXPE
FY2018+0.4 ppCHRW
FY2017−0.3 ppEXPE
FY2016+0.9 ppCHRW
FY2015−7.0 ppEXPE
FY2014−3.1 ppEXPE
FY2013−1.3 ppEXPE
FY2012−1.7 ppEXPE
FY2011−9.6 ppEXPE
FY2010−9.9 ppEXPE
FY2009−6.3 ppEXPE
FY2008+90.0 ppCHRW

The higher net margin has changed hands between CHRW and EXPE over this period.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

EXPE's net margin has been more volatile than CHRW's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 24.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 0.7.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between CHRW and EXPE over these 18 fiscal years — CHRW led in 6 and EXPE in 12.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

EXPE's return on equity has been more volatile than CHRW's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 45.7 percentage points of standard deviation against 7.6.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between CHRW and EXPE over these 18 fiscal years — CHRW led in 15 and EXPE in 3.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages