CLVT vs VRSK
Clarivate PLC and Verisk Analytics, Inc., side by side — 9 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | CLVT | VRSK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.5B | $3.1B |
| Net income | $-201.1M | $908.3M |
| Gross margin | 66.0% | 69.9% |
| Net margin | −8.2% | 29.6% |
| Return on equity | −4.0% | 444.0% |
| Diluted EPS | −$0.30 | $6.48 |
| Dividend / share | · | · |
| Payout ratio | −0.0% | 27.6% |
| Free cash flow | $365.3M | $1.2B |
| Equity | $4.8B | $309.0M |
| Net debt / equity | 0.82× | 13.28× |
| Current ratio | 0.84× | 1.20× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 14.4% | 6.2% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | 5.0% |
VRSK bills 1.3× the revenue of CLVT, and CLVT closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
9 years side by side
| Fiscal year | CLVT | VRSK |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $2.5B | $3.1B |
| FY2024 | $2.6B | $2.9B |
| FY2023 | $2.6B | $2.7B |
| FY2022 | $2.7B | $2.5B |
| FY2021 | $1.9B | $2.5B |
| FY2020 | $1.3B | $2.3B |
| FY2019 | $974.3M | $2.6B |
| FY2018 | $968.5M | $2.4B |
| FY2017 | $917.6M | $2.1B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | CLVT | VRSK |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $-201.1M | $908.3M |
| FY2024 | $-636.7M | $958.2M |
| FY2023 | $-911.2M | $614.6M |
| FY2022 | $-4.0B | $953.9M |
| FY2021 | $-270.5M | $666.2M |
| FY2020 | $-350.6M | $712.7M |
| FY2019 | $-258.6M | $449.9M |
| FY2018 | $-242.2M | $598.7M |
| FY2017 | $-263.9M | $555.1M |
9 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −$617,500,000 | VRSK |
| FY2024 | −$325,000,000 | VRSK |
| FY2023 | −$52,600,000 | VRSK |
| FY2022 | +$162,800,000 | CLVT |
| FY2021 | −$585,600,000 | VRSK |
| FY2020 | −$1,015,300,000 | VRSK |
| FY2019 | −$1,632,755,000 | VRSK |
| FY2018 | −$1,426,632,000 | VRSK |
| FY2017 | −$1,227,566,000 | VRSK |
The higher-revenue side has changed between CLVT and VRSK over this period. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.
9 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
9 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −37.8 pp | VRSK |
| FY2024 | −58.1 pp | VRSK |
| FY2023 | −57.6 pp | VRSK |
| FY2022 | −187.1 pp | VRSK |
| FY2021 | −41.5 pp | VRSK |
| FY2020 | −59.4 pp | VRSK |
| FY2019 | −43.8 pp | VRSK |
| FY2018 | −50.0 pp | VRSK |
| FY2017 | −54.6 pp | VRSK |
VRSK has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 9 fiscal years.
9 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
CLVT's net margin has been more volatile than VRSK's over the 9 comparable fiscal years — 40.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 5.8.
9 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
VRSK led in net margin in every one of the 9 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.
9 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
VRSK's return on equity has been more volatile than CLVT's over the 9 comparable fiscal years — 175.6 percentage points of standard deviation against 11.6.
9 of 13 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
VRSK led in return on equity in every one of the 9 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.
9 of 13 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.