Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / CROX VS GT

CROX vs GT

Crocs, Inc. and Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

CROX vs GT, at a glance
Metric CROX GT
Revenue$4.0B$18.3B
Net income$-81.2M$-1.7B
Gross margin58.3%18.4%
Net margin−2.0%−9.3%
Return on equity−5.2%−43.5%
Diluted EPS−$1.50−$5.99
Dividend / share·$0.00
Payout ratio·−0.0%
Free cash flow$659.2M$-30.0M
Equity$1.3B$3.2B
Net debt / equity0.85×1.70×
Current ratio1.27×1.06×
Revenue CAGR 5y23.9%8.2%
Profit CAGR 5y··

GT bills 4.5× the revenue of CROX, and both closed the last reported year at a loss.

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

CROX vs GT, revenue by year
Fiscal year CROX GT
FY2025$4.0B$18.3B
FY2024$4.1B$18.9B
FY2023$4.0B$20.1B
FY2022$3.6B$20.8B
FY2021$2.3B$17.5B
FY2020$1.4B$12.3B
FY2019$1.2B$14.7B
FY2018$1.1B$15.5B
FY2017$1.0B$15.4B
FY2016$1.0B$15.2B
Net income by year

Bottom line

CROX vs GT, net income by year
Fiscal year CROX GT
FY2025$-81.2M$-1.7B
FY2024$950.1M$46.0M
FY2023$792.6M$-729.0M
FY2022$540.2M$202.0M
FY2021$725.7M$764.0M
FY2020$312.9M$-1.3B
FY2019$119.5M$-311.0M
FY2018$50.4M$693.0M
FY2017$10.2M$346.0M
FY2016$-16.5M$1.3B
Revenue gap over time

17 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$14,239,353,000GT
FY2024−$14,775,892,000GT
FY2023−$16,103,653,000GT
FY2022−$17,250,015,000GT
FY2021−$15,164,584,000GT
FY2020−$10,935,049,000GT
FY2019−$13,514,407,000GT
FY2018−$14,386,795,000GT
FY2017−$14,353,487,000GT
FY2016−$14,121,727,000GT
FY2015−$15,352,370,000GT
FY2014−$16,939,777,000GT
FY2013−$18,347,320,000GT
FY2012−$19,868,699,000GT
FY2011−$21,766,097,000GT
FY2010−$18,042,305,000GT
FY2009−$15,655,233,000GT

GT has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 17 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

17 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+7.3 ppCROX
FY2024+23.0 ppCROX
FY2023+23.6 ppCROX
FY2022+14.2 ppCROX
FY2021+26.9 ppCROX
FY2020+32.7 ppCROX
FY2019+11.7 ppCROX
FY2018+0.1 ppCROX
FY2017−1.4 ppGT
FY2016−10.1 ppGT
FY2015−9.9 ppGT
FY2014−14.3 ppGT
FY2013−2.6 ppGT
FY2012+10.6 ppCROX
FY2011+9.4 ppCROX
FY2010+9.4 ppCROX
FY2009−4.3 ppGT

The higher net margin has changed hands between CROX and GT over this period.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

CROX's net margin has been more volatile than GT's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 11.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 5.6.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between CROX and GT over these 17 fiscal years — CROX led in 11 and GT in 6.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

CROX's return on equity has been more volatile than GT's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 114.6 percentage points of standard deviation against 37.5.

17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between CROX and GT over these 17 fiscal years — CROX led in 10 and GT in 7.

17 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages