Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / CSCO VS IBM

CSCO vs IBM

Cisco Systems, Inc. and International Business Machines Corp., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

CSCO vs IBM, at a glance
Metric CSCO IBM
Revenue$56.7B$67.5B
Net income$10.2B$10.6B
Gross margin64.9%58.2%
Net margin18.0%15.7%
Return on equity22.1%35.3%
Diluted EPS$2.55$11.17
Dividend / share$1.62$6.71
Payout ratio63.2%59.0%
Free cash flow$13.3B$12.1B
Equity$46.8B$32.6B
Net debt / equity0.35×1.46×
Current ratio1.00×0.96×
Revenue CAGR 5y2.8%4.1%
Profit CAGR 5y−1.9%13.6%

IBM bills 1.2× the revenue of CSCO, and CSCO keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (18.0% against 15.7%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

CSCO vs IBM, revenue by year
Fiscal year CSCO IBM
FY2025$56.7B$67.5B
FY2024$53.8B$62.8B
FY2023$57.0B$61.9B
FY2022$51.6B$60.5B
FY2021$49.8B$57.4B
FY2020$49.3B$55.2B
FY2019$51.9B$57.7B
FY2018$49.3B$79.6B
FY2017$48.0B$79.1B
FY2016$49.2B$79.9B
Net income by year

Bottom line

CSCO vs IBM, net income by year
Fiscal year CSCO IBM
FY2025$10.2B$10.6B
FY2024$10.3B$6.0B
FY2023$12.6B$7.5B
FY2022$11.8B$1.6B
FY2021$10.6B$5.7B
FY2020$11.2B$5.6B
FY2019$11.6B$9.4B
FY2018$110.0M$8.7B
FY2017$9.6B$5.8B
FY2016$10.7B$11.9B
Revenue gap over time

18 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$10,881,000,000IBM
FY2024−$8,950,000,000IBM
FY2023−$4,862,000,000IBM
FY2022−$8,973,000,000IBM
FY2021−$7,532,000,000IBM
FY2020−$5,878,000,000IBM
FY2019−$5,810,000,000IBM
FY2018−$30,261,000,000IBM
FY2017−$31,134,000,000IBM
FY2016−$30,672,000,000IBM
FY2015−$32,580,000,000IBM
FY2014−$45,651,000,000IBM
FY2013−$49,760,000,000IBM
FY2012−$56,813,000,000IBM
FY2011−$63,698,000,000IBM
FY2010−$59,830,000,000IBM
FY2009−$59,641,000,000IBM
FY2008−$64,090,000,000IBM

IBM has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 18 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

18 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+2.3 ppCSCO
FY2024+9.6 ppCSCO
FY2023+10.0 ppCSCO
FY2022+20.2 ppCSCO
FY2021+11.2 ppCSCO
FY2020+12.6 ppCSCO
FY2019+6.0 ppCSCO
FY2018−10.7 ppIBM
FY2017+12.7 ppCSCO
FY2016+7.0 ppCSCO
FY2015+2.1 ppCSCO
FY2014+3.7 ppCSCO
FY2013+3.8 ppCSCO
FY2012+1.3 ppCSCO
FY2011+0.2 ppCSCO
FY2010+4.5 ppCSCO
FY2009+3.0 ppCSCO
FY2008+8.5 ppCSCO

The higher net margin has changed hands between CSCO and IBM over this period.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

CSCO's net margin has been more volatile than IBM's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 5.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 3.6.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between CSCO and IBM over these 18 fiscal years — CSCO led in 17 and IBM in 1.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

IBM's return on equity has been more volatile than CSCO's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 24.7 percentage points of standard deviation against 7.6.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between CSCO and IBM over these 18 fiscal years — CSCO led in 2 and IBM in 16.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages