DMC vs GTBIF
DEL Monte Corp. and Green Thumb Industries Inc., side by side — 8 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | DMC | GTBIF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.3B | $1.2B |
| Net income | $90.7M | $114.2M |
| Gross margin | 9.2% | 48.9% |
| Net margin | 2.2% | 9.7% |
| Return on equity | 4.5% | 6.2% |
| Diluted EPS | $1.88 | $0.48 |
| Dividend / share | $1.20 | · |
| Payout ratio | 63.3% | · |
| Free cash flow | $181.3M | $213.9M |
| Equity | $2.0B | $1.9B |
| Net debt / equity | 0.07× | −0.01× |
| Current ratio | 2.16× | 3.26× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 0.6% | 16.1% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | 13.0% | 50.1% |
DMC bills 3.7× the revenue of GTBIF, and GTBIF keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (9.7% against 2.2%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
8 years side by side
| Fiscal year | DMC | GTBIF |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $4.3B | $1.2B |
| FY2024 | $4.3B | $1.1B |
| FY2023 | $4.3B | $1.1B |
| FY2022 | $4.4B | $1.0B |
| FY2021 | $4.3B | $893.6M |
| FY2020 | $4.2B | $556.6M |
| FY2019 | $4.5B | $216.4M |
| FY2018 | $4.5B | $62.5M |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | DMC | GTBIF |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $90.7M | $114.2M |
| FY2024 | $142.2M | $73.1M |
| FY2023 | $-11.4M | $36.3M |
| FY2022 | $98.6M | $12.0M |
| FY2021 | $80.0M | $75.4M |
| FY2020 | $49.2M | $15.0M |
| FY2019 | $66.5M | $-59.1M |
| FY2018 | $-21.9M | $-5.2M |
8 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +$3,147,005,000 | DMC |
| FY2024 | +$3,143,059,000 | DMC |
| FY2023 | +$3,266,147,000 | DMC |
| FY2022 | +$3,424,925,000 | DMC |
| FY2021 | +$3,358,440,000 | DMC |
| FY2020 | +$3,645,727,000 | DMC |
| FY2019 | +$4,272,567,000 | DMC |
| FY2018 | +$4,431,406,320 | DMC |
DMC has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 8 fiscal years. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.
8 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
8 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −7.5 pp | GTBIF |
| FY2024 | −3.1 pp | GTBIF |
| FY2023 | −3.5 pp | GTBIF |
| FY2022 | +1.0 pp | DMC |
| FY2021 | −6.6 pp | GTBIF |
| FY2020 | −1.6 pp | GTBIF |
| FY2019 | +28.9 pp | DMC |
| FY2018 | +8.0 pp | DMC |
The higher net margin has changed hands between DMC and GTBIF over this period.
8 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
GTBIF's net margin has been more volatile than DMC's over the 8 comparable fiscal years — 11.4 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.1.
8 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between DMC and GTBIF over these 8 fiscal years — DMC led in 3 and GTBIF in 5.
8 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
GTBIF's return on equity has been more volatile than DMC's over the 8 comparable fiscal years — 4.9 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.7.
8 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between DMC and GTBIF over these 8 fiscal years — DMC led in 5 and GTBIF in 3.
8 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.