DY vs MTZ
Dycom Industries Inc. and MasTec Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | DY | MTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.5B | $14.3B |
| Net income | $281.2M | $399.0M |
| Gross margin | 20.6% | 12.5% |
| Net margin | 5.1% | 3.0% |
| Return on equity | 18.2% | 12.9% |
| Diluted EPS | $9.56 | $5.07 |
| Dividend / share | · | · |
| Payout ratio | · | · |
| Free cash flow | $401.7M | $285.7M |
| Equity | $1.9B | $3.3B |
| Net debt / equity | 1.13× | 0.55× |
| Current ratio | 2.74× | 1.32× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 11.6% | 17.7% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | 52.3% | 4.3% |
MTZ bills 2.6× the revenue of DY, and DY keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (5.1% against 3.0%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | DY | MTZ |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $5.5B | $14.3B |
| FY2024 | $4.7B | $12.3B |
| FY2023 | $4.2B | $12.0B |
| FY2022 | $3.8B | $9.8B |
| FY2021 | $3.1B | $8.0B |
| FY2020 | $3.2B | $6.3B |
| FY2019 | $3.3B | $7.2B |
| FY2018 | $3.1B | $6.9B |
| FY2017 | $3.1B | $6.6B |
| FY2016 | $2.7B | $5.1B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | DY | MTZ |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $281.2M | $399.0M |
| FY2024 | $233.4M | $162.8M |
| FY2023 | $218.9M | $-49.9M |
| FY2022 | $142.2M | $33.4M |
| FY2021 | $48.6M | $328.8M |
| FY2020 | $34.3M | $322.8M |
| FY2019 | $57.2M | $392.3M |
| FY2018 | $62.9M | $259.7M |
| FY2017 | $157.2M | $347.2M |
| FY2016 | $128.7M | $131.3M |
16 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −$8,753,259,000 | MTZ |
| FY2024 | −$7,601,450,000 | MTZ |
| FY2023 | −$7,820,360,000 | MTZ |
| FY2022 | −$5,969,576,000 | MTZ |
| FY2021 | −$4,821,262,000 | MTZ |
| FY2020 | −$3,121,810,000 | MTZ |
| FY2019 | −$3,843,506,000 | MTZ |
| FY2018 | −$3,781,717,000 | MTZ |
| FY2017 | −$3,540,098,000 | MTZ |
| FY2016 | −$2,462,161,000 | MTZ |
| FY2015 | −$2,186,018,000 | MTZ |
| FY2014 | −$2,800,210,000 | MTZ |
| FY2013 | −$2,716,175,000 | MTZ |
| FY2012 | −$2,525,670,000 | MTZ |
| FY2011 | −$1,795,424,000 | MTZ |
| FY2010 | −$1,154,401,000 | MTZ |
MTZ has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 16 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
16 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
16 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +2.1 pp | DY |
| FY2024 | +3.3 pp | DY |
| FY2023 | +5.6 pp | DY |
| FY2022 | +3.4 pp | DY |
| FY2021 | −2.6 pp | MTZ |
| FY2020 | −4.0 pp | MTZ |
| FY2019 | −3.8 pp | MTZ |
| FY2018 | −1.7 pp | MTZ |
| FY2017 | −0.2 pp | MTZ |
| FY2016 | +2.2 pp | DY |
| FY2015 | +6.1 pp | DY |
| FY2014 | −0.3 pp | MTZ |
| FY2013 | −1.1 pp | MTZ |
| FY2012 | +0.4 pp | DY |
| FY2011 | −2.2 pp | MTZ |
| FY2010 | −3.6 pp | MTZ |
The higher net margin has changed hands between DY and MTZ over this period.
16 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
MTZ's net margin has been more volatile than DY's over the 16 comparable fiscal years — 2.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.6.
16 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between DY and MTZ over these 16 fiscal years — DY led in 7 and MTZ in 9.
16 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
MTZ's return on equity has been more volatile than DY's over the 16 comparable fiscal years — 8.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 7.6.
16 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between DY and MTZ over these 16 fiscal years — DY led in 6 and MTZ in 10.
16 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.