Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / FAST VS SHW

FAST vs SHW

Fastenal Co. and Sherwin Williams Co., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

FAST vs SHW, at a glance
Metric FAST SHW
Revenue$8.2B$23.6B
Net income$1.3B$2.6B
Gross margin45.0%48.8%
Net margin15.3%10.9%
Return on equity33.3%59.4%
Diluted EPS$1.09$10.26
Dividend / share$0.88$3.16
Payout ratio79.8%30.7%
Free cash flow$1.1B$2.7B
Equity$3.9B$4.6B
Net debt / equity−0.04×2.06×
Current ratio4.85×0.87×
Revenue CAGR 5y7.7%5.1%
Profit CAGR 5y7.9%4.8%

SHW bills 2.9× the revenue of FAST, and FAST keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (15.3% against 10.9%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

FAST vs SHW, revenue by year
Fiscal year FAST SHW
FY2025$8.2B$23.6B
FY2024$7.5B$23.1B
FY2023$7.3B$23.1B
FY2022$7.0B$22.1B
FY2021$6.0B$19.9B
FY2020$5.6B$18.4B
FY2019$5.3B$17.9B
FY2018$5.0B$17.5B
FY2017$4.4B$15.0B
FY2016$4.0B$11.9B
Net income by year

Bottom line

FAST vs SHW, net income by year
Fiscal year FAST SHW
FY2025$1.3B$2.6B
FY2024$1.2B$2.7B
FY2023$1.2B$2.4B
FY2022$1.1B$2.0B
FY2021$925.0M$1.9B
FY2020$859.1M$2.0B
FY2019$790.9M$1.5B
FY2018$751.9M$1.1B
FY2017$578.6M$1.7B
FY2016$499.4M$1.1B
Revenue gap over time

19 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$15,373,800,000SHW
FY2024−$15,552,500,000SHW
FY2023−$15,705,200,000SHW
FY2022−$15,168,300,000SHW
FY2021−$13,933,700,000SHW
FY2020−$12,714,400,000SHW
FY2019−$12,567,100,000SHW
FY2018−$12,569,400,000SHW
FY2017−$10,593,300,000SHW
FY2016−$7,893,602,000SHW
FY2015−$7,469,800,000SHW
FY2014−$7,396,493,000SHW
FY2013−$6,859,894,000SHW
FY2012−$6,400,423,000SHW
FY2011−$5,999,141,000SHW
FY2010−$5,506,953,000SHW
FY2009−$5,163,919,000SHW
FY2008−$5,639,302,000SHW
FY2007−$5,943,473,000SHW

SHW has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 19 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

19 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+4.5 ppFAST
FY2024+3.6 ppFAST
FY2023+5.4 ppFAST
FY2022+6.4 ppFAST
FY2021+6.0 ppFAST
FY2020+4.2 ppFAST
FY2019+6.2 ppFAST
FY2018+8.8 ppFAST
FY2017+1.6 ppFAST
FY2016+3.1 ppFAST
FY2015+4.1 ppFAST
FY2014+5.5 ppFAST
FY2013+6.1 ppFAST
FY2012+6.8 ppFAST
FY2011+7.9 ppFAST
FY2010+5.7 ppFAST
FY2009+3.4 ppFAST
FY2008+6.0 ppFAST
FY2007+3.6 ppFAST

FAST has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 19 fiscal years.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

SHW's net margin has been more volatile than FAST's over the 19 comparable fiscal years — 2.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.7.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

FAST led in net margin in every one of the 19 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

SHW's return on equity has been more volatile than FAST's over the 19 comparable fiscal years — 22.4 percentage points of standard deviation against 4.9.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between FAST and SHW over these 19 fiscal years — FAST led in 1 and SHW in 18.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages