Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / GOOD VS RHEP

GOOD vs RHEP

Gladstone Commercial Corp. and Regional Health Properties, Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

GOOD vs RHEP, at a glance
Metric GOOD RHEP
Revenue$161.3M$53.2M
Net income$19.3M$3.4M
Gross margin92.8%86.9%
Net margin12.0%6.3%
Return on equity11.2%·
Diluted EPS$0.14$1.09
Dividend / share$1.20·
Payout ratio353.5%·
Free cash flow·$-3.1M
Equity$171.8M$349,000
Net debt / equity4.85×106.45×
Current ratio·0.67×
Revenue CAGR 5y3.9%24.8%
Profit CAGR 5y5.2%·

GOOD bills 3.0× the revenue of RHEP, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (12.0% against 6.3%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

GOOD vs RHEP, revenue by year
Fiscal year GOOD RHEP
FY2025$161.3M$53.2M
FY2024$149.4M$18.3M
FY2023$147.6M$17.2M
FY2022$149.0M$35.9M
FY2021$137.7M$26.7M
FY2020$133.2M$17.6M
FY2019$114.4M$20.1M
FY2018$106.8M$22.0M
FY2017$94.8M$25.1M
FY2016$86.4M$27.6M
Net income by year

Bottom line

GOOD vs RHEP, net income by year
Fiscal year GOOD RHEP
FY2025$19.3M$3.4M
FY2024$24.0M$-3.2M
FY2023$5.0M$-3.9M
FY2022$10.8M$-6.9M
FY2021$10.9M$-1.2M
FY2020$14.9M$-688,000
FY2019$9.6M$5.5M
FY2018$12.3M$-11.9M
FY2017$5.9M$-985,000
FY2016$4.0M$-7.5M
Revenue gap over time

16 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$108,176,000GOOD
FY2024+$131,053,000GOOD
FY2023+$130,420,000GOOD
FY2022+$113,056,000GOOD
FY2021+$110,998,000GOOD
FY2020+$115,573,000GOOD
FY2019+$94,253,000GOOD
FY2018+$84,752,000GOOD
FY2017+$69,651,000GOOD
FY2016+$58,771,000GOOD
FY2015+$65,366,000GOOD
FY2014+$70,431,000GOOD
FY2013−$124,407,000RHEP
FY2012−$142,807,000RHEP
FY2011−$94,236,000RHEP
FY2010−$8,862,514RHEP

The higher-revenue side has changed between GOOD and RHEP over this period. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

16 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

15 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+5.6 ppGOOD
FY2024+33.6 ppGOOD
FY2023+26.0 ppGOOD
FY2022+26.4 ppGOOD
FY2021+12.3 ppGOOD
FY2020+15.2 ppGOOD
FY2019−19.0 ppRHEP
FY2018+65.5 ppGOOD
FY2017+10.2 ppGOOD
FY2016+31.6 ppGOOD
FY2015+127.7 ppGOOD
FY2014+425.2 ppGOOD
FY2013+9.7 ppGOOD
FY2012+11.2 ppGOOD
FY2010+16.1 ppGOOD

The higher net margin has changed hands between GOOD and RHEP over this period.

15 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

RHEP's net margin has been more volatile than GOOD's over the 15 comparable fiscal years — 108.6 percentage points of standard deviation against 5.4.

15 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between GOOD and RHEP over these 15 fiscal years — GOOD led in 14 and RHEP in 1.

15 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

RHEP's return on equity has been more volatile than GOOD's over the 10 comparable fiscal years — 77.6 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.7.

10 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between GOOD and RHEP over these 10 fiscal years — GOOD led in 9 and RHEP in 1.

10 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages