GOOD vs STHO
Gladstone Commercial Corp. and Star Holdings, side by side — 5 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | GOOD | STHO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $161.3M | $110.1M |
| Net income | $19.3M | $-64.2M |
| Gross margin | 92.8% | 74.0% |
| Net margin | 12.0% | −64.3% |
| Return on equity | 11.2% | −22.3% |
| Diluted EPS | $0.14 | −$4.90 |
| Dividend / share | $1.20 | · |
| Payout ratio | 353.5% | · |
| Free cash flow | · | $-17.4M |
| Equity | $171.8M | $251.8M |
| Net debt / equity | 4.85× | 0.87× |
| Current ratio | · | · |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 3.9% | · |
| Profit CAGR 5y | 5.2% | · |
GOOD bills 1.5× the revenue of STHO, and STHO closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
5 years side by side
| Fiscal year | GOOD | STHO |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $161.3M | $110.1M |
| FY2024 | $149.4M | $113.3M |
| FY2023 | $147.6M | $123.1M |
| FY2022 | $149.0M | $124.1M |
| FY2021 | $137.7M | $272.2M |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | GOOD | STHO |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $19.3M | $-64.2M |
| FY2024 | $24.0M | $-86.8M |
| FY2023 | $5.0M | $-196.4M |
| FY2022 | $10.8M | $-36.3M |
| FY2021 | $10.9M | $62.7M |
5 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +$51,193,000 | GOOD |
| FY2024 | +$36,091,000 | GOOD |
| FY2023 | +$24,531,000 | GOOD |
| FY2022 | +$24,904,000 | GOOD |
| FY2021 | −$134,487,000 | STHO |
The higher-revenue side has changed between GOOD and STHO over this period. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.
5 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
5 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +76.2 pp | GOOD |
| FY2024 | +94.1 pp | GOOD |
| FY2023 | +162.9 pp | GOOD |
| FY2022 | +36.5 pp | GOOD |
| FY2021 | −15.1 pp | STHO |
The higher net margin has changed hands between GOOD and STHO over this period.
5 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
STHO's net margin has been more volatile than GOOD's over the 5 comparable fiscal years — 60.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 4.4.
5 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between GOOD and STHO over these 5 fiscal years — GOOD led in 4 and STHO in 1.
5 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
STHO's return on equity has been more volatile than GOOD's over the 5 comparable fiscal years — 13.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 4.4.
5 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
GOOD led in return on equity in every one of the 5 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.
5 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.