Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / HON VS LMT

HON vs LMT

Honeywell International Inc. and Lockheed Martin Corp., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

HON vs LMT, at a glance
Metric HON LMT
Revenue$37.4B$75.0B
Net income$4.7B$5.0B
Gross margin36.9%10.2%
Net margin12.7%6.7%
Return on equity29.1%76.9%
Diluted EPS$7.36$21.49
Dividend / share$4.58$13.35
Payout ratio62.9%62.4%
Free cash flow$5.4B$6.9B
Equity$13.9B$6.7B
Net debt / equity1.61×2.62×
Current ratio1.30×1.09×
Revenue CAGR 5y2.8%2.8%
Profit CAGR 5y−0.2%−6.0%

LMT bills 2.0× the revenue of HON, and HON keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (12.7% against 6.7%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

HON vs LMT, revenue by year
Fiscal year HON LMT
FY2025$37.4B$75.0B
FY2024$34.7B$71.0B
FY2023$33.0B$67.6B
FY2022$35.5B$66.0B
FY2021$34.4B$67.0B
FY2020$32.6B$65.4B
FY2019$36.7B$59.8B
FY2018$41.8B$53.8B
FY2017$40.5B$50.0B
FY2016$39.3B$47.3B
Net income by year

Bottom line

HON vs LMT, net income by year
Fiscal year HON LMT
FY2025$4.7B$5.0B
FY2024$5.7B$5.3B
FY2023$5.7B$6.9B
FY2022$5.0B$5.7B
FY2021$5.5B$6.3B
FY2020$4.8B$6.8B
FY2019$6.1B$6.2B
FY2018$6.8B$5.0B
FY2017$1.5B$2.0B
FY2016$4.8B$5.2B
Revenue gap over time

19 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$37,606,000,000LMT
FY2024−$36,326,000,000LMT
FY2023−$34,562,000,000LMT
FY2022−$30,518,000,000LMT
FY2021−$32,652,000,000LMT
FY2020−$32,761,000,000LMT
FY2019−$23,103,000,000LMT
FY2018−$11,960,000,000LMT
FY2017−$9,426,000,000LMT
FY2016−$7,988,000,000LMT
FY2015−$1,955,000,000LMT
FY2014+$360,000,000HON
FY2013−$6,303,000,000LMT
FY2012−$9,517,000,000LMT
FY2011−$9,970,000,000LMT
FY2010−$13,321,000,000LMT
FY2009−$13,916,000,000LMT
FY2008−$4,816,000,000LMT
FY2007−$7,273,000,000LMT

The higher-revenue side has changed between HON and LMT over this period. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

19 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+6.1 ppHON
FY2024+9.0 ppHON
FY2023+6.9 ppHON
FY2022+5.3 ppHON
FY2021+6.9 ppHON
FY2020+4.5 ppHON
FY2019+6.6 ppHON
FY2018+6.9 ppHON
FY2017−0.0 ppLMT
FY2016+1.4 ppHON
FY2015+3.7 ppHON
FY2014+1.7 ppHON
FY2013+3.6 ppHON
FY2012+2.0 ppHON
FY2011−0.0 ppLMT
FY2010−0.0 ppLMT
FY2009−1.5 ppLMT
FY2008−5.5 ppLMT
FY2007−0.2 ppLMT

The higher net margin has changed hands between HON and LMT over this period.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

HON's net margin has been more volatile than LMT's over the 19 comparable fiscal years — 4.8 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.9.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between HON and LMT over these 19 fiscal years — HON led in 13 and LMT in 6.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

LMT's return on equity has been more volatile than HON's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 115.7 percentage points of standard deviation against 6.0.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

LMT led in return on equity in every one of the 17 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

17 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages