Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / LEVI VS LULU

LEVI vs LULU

Levi Strauss & Co. and lululemon athletica Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

LEVI vs LULU, at a glance
Metric LEVI LULU
Revenue$6.3B$11.1B
Net income$578.1M$1.6B
Gross margin61.7%56.6%
Net margin9.2%14.2%
Return on equity27.2%34.0%
Diluted EPS$1.45$13.26
Dividend / share$0.54·
Payout ratio36.8%·
Free cash flow$308.2M$921.7M
Equity$2.3B$5.0B
Net debt / equity0.12×·
Current ratio1.55×2.26×
Revenue CAGR 5y7.1%20.3%
Profit CAGR 5y·21.8%

LULU bills 1.8× the revenue of LEVI, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (14.2% against 9.2%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

LEVI vs LULU, revenue by year
Fiscal year LEVI LULU
FY2025$6.3B$11.1B
FY2024$6.0B$10.6B
FY2023$5.8B$9.6B
FY2022$6.2B$8.1B
FY2021$5.8B$6.3B
FY2020$4.5B$4.4B
FY2019$5.8B$4.0B
FY2018$5.6B$3.3B
FY2017$4.9B$2.6B
FY2016$4.6B$2.3B
Net income by year

Bottom line

LEVI vs LULU, net income by year
Fiscal year LEVI LULU
FY2025$578.1M$1.6B
FY2024$210.6M$1.8B
FY2023$249.6M$1.6B
FY2022$569.1M$854.8M
FY2021$553.5M$975.3M
FY2020$-127.1M$588.9M
FY2019$394.6M$645.6M
FY2018$283.1M$483.8M
FY2017$281.4M$258.7M
FY2016$291.1M$303.4M
Revenue gap over time

17 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$4,820,600,000LULU
FY2024−$4,556,126,000LULU
FY2023−$3,777,178,000LULU
FY2022−$1,941,918,000LULU
FY2021−$492,717,000LULU
FY2020+$50,721,000LEVI
FY2019+$1,783,791,000LEVI
FY2018+$2,287,121,000LEVI
FY2017+$2,254,849,000LEVI
FY2016+$2,208,347,000LEVI
FY2015+$2,433,970,000LEVI
FY2014+$2,956,779,000LEVI
FY2013+$3,090,503,000LEVI
FY2012+$3,239,835,000LEVI
FY2011+$3,760,727,000LEVI
FY2010+$3,698,945,000LEVI
FY2009+$3,652,868,000LEVI

The higher-revenue side has changed between LEVI and LULU over this period. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

17 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−5.0 ppLULU
FY2024−13.6 ppLULU
FY2023−11.8 ppLULU
FY2022−1.3 ppLULU
FY2021−6.0 ppLULU
FY2020−16.2 ppLULU
FY2019−9.4 ppLULU
FY2018−9.6 ppLULU
FY2017−4.0 ppLULU
FY2016−6.5 ppLULU
FY2015−8.2 ppLULU
FY2014−11.1 ppLULU
FY2013−12.7 ppLULU
FY2012−16.7 ppLULU
FY2011−15.8 ppLULU
FY2010−13.8 ppLULU
FY2009−9.2 ppLULU

LULU has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 17 fiscal years.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

LEVI's net margin has been more volatile than LULU's over the 17 comparable fiscal years — 2.9 percentage points of standard deviation against 2.7.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

LULU led in net margin in every one of the 17 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

17 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

LEVI's return on equity has been more volatile than LULU's over the 12 comparable fiscal years — 25.7 percentage points of standard deviation against 7.7.

12 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between LEVI and LULU over these 12 fiscal years — LEVI led in 7 and LULU in 5.

12 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages