LOVE vs RH
Lovesac Co. and RH, side by side — 9 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | LOVE | RH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $697.1M | $3.4B |
| Net income | $4.1M | $124.8M |
| Gross margin | 56.4% | 44.1% |
| Net margin | 0.6% | 3.6% |
| Return on equity | 1.9% | · |
| Diluted EPS | $0.28 | $6.31 |
| Dividend / share | · | · |
| Payout ratio | · | · |
| Free cash flow | $26.2M | $252.4M |
| Equity | $218.7M | $60.6M |
| Net debt / equity | · | · |
| Current ratio | 1.61× | 1.19× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 16.8% | 3.8% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | −22.7% | −14.4% |
RH bills 4.9× the revenue of LOVE, and keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (3.6% against 0.6%).
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
9 years side by side
| Fiscal year | LOVE | RH |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $697.1M | $3.4B |
| FY2024 | $680.6M | $3.2B |
| FY2023 | $700.3M | $3.0B |
| FY2022 | $651.2M | $3.6B |
| FY2021 | $498.2M | $3.8B |
| FY2020 | $320.7M | $2.8B |
| FY2019 | $233.4M | $2.6B |
| FY2018 | $165.9M | $2.5B |
| FY2017 | $101.8M | $2.4B |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | LOVE | RH |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $4.1M | $124.8M |
| FY2024 | $11.6M | $72.4M |
| FY2023 | $23.9M | $127.6M |
| FY2022 | $26.5M | $528.6M |
| FY2021 | $47.5M | $688.5M |
| FY2020 | $14.7M | $271.8M |
| FY2019 | $-15.2M | $220.4M |
| FY2018 | $-6.7M | $135.7M |
| FY2017 | $-5.5M | $-2.6M |
9 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −$2,742,421,000 | RH |
| FY2024 | −$2,500,125,000 | RH |
| FY2023 | −$2,328,861,000 | RH |
| FY2022 | −$2,939,298,000 | RH |
| FY2021 | −$3,260,581,000 | RH |
| FY2020 | −$2,527,888,000 | RH |
| FY2019 | −$2,414,060,000 | RH |
| FY2018 | −$2,339,771,703 | RH |
| FY2017 | −$2,338,363,587 | RH |
RH has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 9 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
9 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
9 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −3.0 pp | RH |
| FY2024 | −0.6 pp | RH |
| FY2023 | −0.8 pp | RH |
| FY2022 | −10.7 pp | RH |
| FY2021 | −8.8 pp | RH |
| FY2020 | −5.0 pp | RH |
| FY2019 | −14.8 pp | RH |
| FY2018 | −9.5 pp | RH |
| FY2017 | −5.3 pp | RH |
RH has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 9 fiscal years.
9 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
RH's net margin has been more volatile than LOVE's over the 9 comparable fiscal years — 5.7 percentage points of standard deviation against 5.0.
9 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
RH led in net margin in every one of the 9 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.
9 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
RH's return on equity has been more volatile than LOVE's over the 3 comparable fiscal years — 25.6 percentage points of standard deviation against 9.8.
3 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
RH led in return on equity in every one of the 3 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.
3 of 16 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.