Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / LOW VS SHW

LOW vs SHW

Lowes Companies Inc. and Sherwin Williams Co., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

LOW vs SHW, at a glance
Metric LOW SHW
Revenue$86.3B$23.6B
Net income$6.7B$2.6B
Gross margin33.5%48.8%
Net margin7.7%10.9%
Return on equity·59.4%
Diluted EPS$11.85$10.26
Dividend / share$4.75$3.16
Payout ratio39.6%30.7%
Free cash flow$7.7B$2.7B
Equity$-9.9B$4.6B
Net debt / equity·2.06×
Current ratio1.08×0.87×
Revenue CAGR 5y−0.8%5.1%
Profit CAGR 5y2.7%4.8%

LOW bills 3.7× the revenue of SHW, and SHW keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (10.9% against 7.7%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

LOW vs SHW, revenue by year
Fiscal year LOW SHW
FY2025$86.3B$23.6B
FY2024$83.7B$23.1B
FY2023$86.4B$23.1B
FY2022$97.1B$22.1B
FY2021$96.2B$19.9B
FY2020$89.6B$18.4B
FY2019$72.1B$17.9B
FY2018$71.3B$17.5B
FY2017$68.6B$15.0B
FY2016$65.0B$11.9B
Net income by year

Bottom line

LOW vs SHW, net income by year
Fiscal year LOW SHW
FY2025$6.7B$2.6B
FY2024$7.0B$2.7B
FY2023$7.7B$2.4B
FY2022$6.4B$2.0B
FY2021$8.4B$1.9B
FY2020$5.8B$2.0B
FY2019$4.3B$1.5B
FY2018$2.3B$1.1B
FY2017$3.4B$1.7B
FY2016$3.1B$1.1B
Revenue gap over time

19 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025+$62,711,700,000LOW
FY2024+$60,575,500,000LOW
FY2023+$63,325,100,000LOW
FY2022+$74,910,100,000LOW
FY2021+$76,305,400,000LOW
FY2020+$71,235,300,000LOW
FY2019+$54,247,200,000LOW
FY2018+$53,774,500,000LOW
FY2017+$53,635,200,000LOW
FY2016+$53,161,398,000LOW
FY2015+$47,735,000,000LOW
FY2014+$45,093,000,000LOW
FY2013+$43,231,000,000LOW
FY2012+$40,987,000,000LOW
FY2011+$41,442,000,000LOW
FY2010+$41,038,576,000LOW
FY2009+$40,125,751,000LOW
FY2008+$40,250,273,000LOW
FY2007+$40,277,708,000LOW

LOW has reported the higher revenue in every one of these 19 fiscal years. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

19 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−3.2 ppSHW
FY2024−3.3 ppSHW
FY2023−1.4 ppSHW
FY2022−2.5 ppSHW
FY2021−0.6 ppSHW
FY2020−4.5 ppSHW
FY2019−2.7 ppSHW
FY2018−3.1 ppSHW
FY2017−6.5 ppSHW
FY2016−4.8 ppSHW
FY2015−5.0 ppSHW
FY2014−3.0 ppSHW
FY2013−3.1 ppSHW
FY2012−2.7 ppSHW
FY2011−1.4 ppSHW
FY2010−1.8 ppSHW
FY2009−2.4 ppSHW
FY2008−1.4 ppSHW
FY2007−1.9 ppSHW

SHW has kept the higher net margin in every one of these 19 fiscal years.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

SHW's net margin has been more volatile than LOW's over the 19 comparable fiscal years — 2.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 1.8.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

SHW led in net margin in every one of the 19 comparable fiscal years — a structural lead, not a recent swing.

19 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

LOW's return on equity has been more volatile than SHW's over the 14 comparable fiscal years — 87.1 percentage points of standard deviation against 24.0.

14 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between LOW and SHW over these 14 fiscal years — LOW led in 3 and SHW in 11.

14 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages