Skip to content
MARKETS / COMPARE / MDU VS NJR

MDU vs NJR

MDU Resources Group Inc. and NEW Jersey Resources Corp., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.

At a glance

Most recent reported year

MDU vs NJR, at a glance
Metric MDU NJR
Revenue$1.9B$2.0B
Net income$190.4M$335.6M
Gross margin··
Net margin10.2%16.5%
Return on equity7.0%14.6%
Diluted EPS$0.93$3.33
Dividend / share$0.54$1.82
Payout ratio56.9%53.7%
Free cash flow$-297.0M·
Equity$2.8B$2.4B
Net debt / equity0.96×1.44×
Current ratio0.84×0.73×
Revenue CAGR 5y−19.5%0.8%
Profit CAGR 5y−13.4%15.5%

MDU and NJR book revenue within 15% of each other, and NJR keeps more of each dollar of revenue as profit (16.5% against 10.2%).

The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.

Revenue by year

10 years side by side

MDU vs NJR, revenue by year
Fiscal year MDU NJR
FY2025$1.9B$2.0B
FY2024$1.8B$1.8B
FY2023$1.8B$2.0B
FY2022$1.8B$2.9B
FY2021$3.5B$2.2B
FY2020$5.5B$2.0B
FY2019$5.3B$2.6B
FY2018$4.5B$2.9B
FY2017$4.4B$2.3B
FY2016$4.1B$1.9B
Net income by year

Bottom line

MDU vs NJR, net income by year
Fiscal year MDU NJR
FY2025$190.4M$335.6M
FY2024$281.1M$289.8M
FY2023$414.7M$264.7M
FY2022$367.5M$274.9M
FY2021$378.1M$117.9M
FY2020$390.2M$163.0M
FY2019$335.5M$123.9M
FY2018$272.3M$233.4M
FY2017$281.2M$132.1M
FY2016$-67.3M$131.7M
Revenue gap over time

18 fiscal years

Revenue gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−$161,346,000NJR
FY2024−$38,561,000NJR
FY2023−$157,187,000NJR
FY2022−$1,151,821,000NJR
FY2021+$1,297,823,000MDU
FY2020+$3,579,082,000MDU
FY2019+$2,744,731,000MDU
FY2018+$1,616,443,000MDU
FY2017+$2,174,734,000MDU
FY2016+$2,247,923,000MDU
FY2015+$1,280,065,000MDU
FY2014+$376,928,000MDU
FY2013+$722,103,000MDU
FY2012+$1,826,508,000MDU
FY2011+$1,041,283,000MDU
FY2010+$1,270,391,000MDU
FY2009+$1,584,041,000MDU
FY2008+$1,187,068,000MDU

The higher-revenue side has changed between MDU and NJR over this period. The gap has narrowed since the earliest year compared.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin gap over time

18 fiscal years

Net margin gap over time
Fiscal year Difference Ahead
FY2025−6.3 ppNJR
FY2024−0.1 ppNJR
FY2023+9.5 ppMDU
FY2022+11.5 ppMDU
FY2021+5.5 ppMDU
FY2020−1.3 ppNJR
FY2019+1.5 ppMDU
FY2018−2.1 ppNJR
FY2017+0.4 ppMDU
FY2016−8.8 ppNJR
FY2015−23.1 ppNJR
FY2014+3.3 ppMDU
FY2013+3.5 ppMDU
FY2012−4.2 ppNJR
FY2011+1.8 ppMDU
FY2010+1.6 ppMDU
FY2009−4.0 ppNJR
FY2008+3.0 ppMDU

The higher net margin has changed hands between MDU and NJR over this period.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Net margin volatility

Standard deviation, each side

MDU's net margin has been more volatile than NJR's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 8.6 percentage points of standard deviation against 4.3.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in net margin

Year by year

The lead in net margin changed hands between MDU and NJR over these 18 fiscal years — MDU led in 10 and NJR in 8.

18 of 19 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Return on equity volatility

Standard deviation, each side

MDU's return on equity has been more volatile than NJR's over the 18 comparable fiscal years — 9.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 3.6.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

Who led in return on equity

Year by year

The lead in return on equity changed hands between MDU and NJR over these 18 fiscal years — MDU led in 4 and NJR in 14.

18 of 18 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.

More in this industry

Other pairs

The companies

Full pages