METC vs NC
Ramaco Resources, Inc. and Nacco Industries Inc., side by side — 10 fiscal years reported in USD, drawn from SEC filings.
Most recent reported year
| Metric | METC | NC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $536.6M | $277.2M |
| Net income | $-51.4M | $17.6M |
| Gross margin | 15.5% | 13.9% |
| Net margin | −9.6% | 6.3% |
| Return on equity | −12.2% | 4.2% |
| Diluted EPS | −$0.99 | $2.35 |
| Dividend / share | · | $0.98 |
| Payout ratio | −8.4% | 41.7% |
| Free cash flow | · | $2.3M |
| Equity | $483.6M | $429.2M |
| Net debt / equity | 0.06× | 0.12× |
| Current ratio | 5.46× | 3.09× |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 26.0% | 16.6% |
| Profit CAGR 5y | · | 3.5% |
METC bills 1.9× the revenue of NC, and METC closed the last reported year at a loss.
The stronger figure of the pair is set in bold. That is arithmetic, not a recommendation — this page does not pick a winner. "·" marks a figure not available in our data.
10 years side by side
| Fiscal year | METC | NC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $536.6M | $277.2M |
| FY2024 | $666.3M | $237.7M |
| FY2023 | $693.5M | $214.8M |
| FY2022 | $565.7M | $241.7M |
| FY2021 | $283.4M | $191.8M |
| FY2020 | $168.9M | $128.4M |
| FY2019 | $168.9M | $141.0M |
| FY2018 | $227.6M | $135.4M |
| FY2017 | $61.0M | $104.8M |
| FY2016 | $5.2M | $111.1M |
Bottom line
| Fiscal year | METC | NC |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | $-51.4M | $17.6M |
| FY2024 | $11.2M | $33.7M |
| FY2023 | $82.3M | $-39.6M |
| FY2022 | $116.0M | $74.2M |
| FY2021 | $39.8M | $48.1M |
| FY2020 | $-4.9M | $14.8M |
| FY2019 | $24.9M | $39.6M |
| FY2018 | $25.1M | $34.8M |
| FY2017 | $-15.4M | $30.3M |
| FY2016 | $-7.5M | $29.6M |
10 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | +$259,420,000 | METC |
| FY2024 | +$428,587,000 | METC |
| FY2023 | +$478,730,000 | METC |
| FY2022 | +$323,969,000 | METC |
| FY2021 | +$91,548,000 | METC |
| FY2020 | +$40,483,000 | METC |
| FY2019 | +$27,925,000 | METC |
| FY2018 | +$92,199,000 | METC |
| FY2017 | −$43,742,000 | NC |
| FY2016 | −$105,865,000 | NC |
The higher-revenue side has changed between METC and NC over this period. The gap has widened since the earliest year compared.
10 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
10 fiscal years
| Fiscal year | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | −15.9 pp | NC |
| FY2024 | −12.5 pp | NC |
| FY2023 | +30.3 pp | METC |
| FY2022 | −10.2 pp | NC |
| FY2021 | −11.1 pp | NC |
| FY2020 | −14.4 pp | NC |
| FY2019 | −13.3 pp | NC |
| FY2018 | −14.7 pp | NC |
| FY2017 | −54.2 pp | NC |
| FY2016 | −170.7 pp | NC |
The higher net margin has changed hands between METC and NC over this period.
10 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
METC's net margin has been more volatile than NC's over the 10 comparable fiscal years — 46.3 percentage points of standard deviation against 14.4.
10 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in net margin changed hands between METC and NC over these 10 fiscal years — METC led in 1 and NC in 9.
10 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Standard deviation, each side
METC's return on equity has been more volatile than NC's over the 9 comparable fiscal years — 22.0 percentage points of standard deviation against 8.1.
9 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.
Year by year
The lead in return on equity changed hands between METC and NC over these 9 fiscal years — METC led in 5 and NC in 4.
9 of 17 comparable fiscal years — a year missing data on either side is not counted.